Generated by All in One SEO Pro v4.9.8, this is an llms-full.txt file, used by LLMs to index the site. # Primary Food Processors PFP ## Posts ### [Primary Food Processors on the ETS proposals: A constructive framework for climate ambition and industrial competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/primary-food-processors-on-the-ets-proposals-a-constructive-framework-for-climate-ambition-and-industrial-competitiveness/) **Published:** July 28, 2026 **Author:** Catherine Jaworowska **Content:** **Primary Food Processors on the ETS proposals: A constructive framework for climate ambition and industrial competitiveness** EU Primary Food Processors (PFP) welcome the European Commission’s published ETS proposals as a constructive step for Europe’s energy-intensive food and bioeconomy industries. PFP members, which transform around 220 million tonnes of agricultural raw materials a year and employ over 120,000 people across the EU, depend on an ETS framework that pairs climate ambition with the conditions for industrial transformation. **On carbon leakage protection,** PFP welcomes the extension of free allocation and the carbon-leakage list to 2040, without reopening the list for revision. Maintaining robust protection for internationally exposed sectors — which compete globally and face imports from countries without equivalent carbon constraints — is essential to keep production, and its emissions, within Europe. Sugar, starch, and (vegetable) oils and fats are all carbon leakage sectors and will continue to benefit from free allocation to support our competitiveness against foreign competitors that are not subject to equivalent carbon costs. **On benchmarks,** additional free allocation for 2026-30 for sectors covered by the fallback benchmarks is a logical step and comes at a critical time given the upward pressure on energy costs from the intensification of the U.S.-Iran coflict. We also welcome that the ETS revision proposal cuts the maximum benchmark update rate from 2.5% to 2% per annum. However, we regret that this proposal does not introduce a new methodology for the calculation of the product and fallback benchmarks, which would continue to be based on the 10% best-performing installations, apparently regardless of the technological feasibility of meeting such levels. **On the emissions trajectory and carbon market,** the ”flattening of the curve”, via reduced Linear Reduction Factors, and the possibility to deploy international carbon credits and bioenergy + carbon capture & storage (BECCS) are pragmatic steps, In addition, the changes to the Market Stability Reserve should contribute to a more stable carbon market and thereby improve investment predictability, which is after all essential to plan the long-lead decarbonisation projects the transition requires. **On funding,** PFP welcomes the recognition that for too long, too little revenue from the ETS has been channeled back to industry. The €100 bn Industrial Decarbonisation Bank could be a useful instrument in this regard, but its operation must align with the principle of technology neutrality, recognising that full electrification is not always technically or economically feasible for certain production sites, including many primary food processing facilities. PFP also welcomes the push for Member States to channel a higher share of auction revenues towards industrial decarbonisation. *“Today’s proposals show that climate ambition and industrial competitiveness can move forward together. Europe’s primary food processors are committed to the transition, and a framework grounded in industrial reality is what will make it deliver. We look forward to working with the institutions through the phase ahead.”**Christophe Lescroart, PFP President, on behalf of the Primary Food Processors of the EU* **Two additional points warrant further work:** the proposal for free allocation to become fully conditional on decarbonisation investments from 2031, and the absence of an export carbon leakage mechanism. PFP looks forward to working with the co-legislators to ensure conditionality is workable for industrial operators and that the competitiveness of European exporters is safeguarded as the files advance. -END- **Categories:** Press Releases, News --- ### [The EU Competitiveness agenda and Competitiveness Fund 2028–2034 must put agriculture and the agri-food chain at their core](https://pfp-eu.org/the-eu-competitiveness-agenda-and-competitiveness-fund-2028-2034-must-put-agriculture-and-the-agri-food-chain-at-their-core/) **Published:** July 14, 2026 **Author:** Tiziana Viotto **Content:** Agriculture and Food have always been at the heart of the European project, a pillar of our economy, our security and our way of life. It is a strategic sector of the economy, be it at EU or national level. Taken together, the entire agrifood value chain generates more than €1 trillion in gross value added to the EU economy, surpassing the economic footprint of other EU industries. Every day, Europe’s farmers and agri-food actors provide citizens with safe, high-quality and nutritious food, alongside feed, fuel and fibre. In doing so, they strengthen Europe’s resilience, sustainability and stability in an increasingly uncertain geopolitical environment. The signing organisations consider the European Competitiveness Fund (ECF) a major opportunity to mobilise investments in agriculture, food and the whole agri-food chain – including its processing and manufacturing activities – within the future Multiannual Financial Framework enabling deployment of key strategic investments for infrastructure, services and skills focusing on strategic actions and reducing the investment gap of the sector. Achieving this potential requires a coherent framework that goes beyond agricultural policy alone. Agriculture and the agri-food chain have a unique capacity to contribute to all ECF priorities: clean transition and decarbonisation, digital transformation, health, biotechnology, agriculture and bioeconomy, as well as security, defence and space. This recognition must be **reflected in the design and implementation of the ECF through dedicated sufficient resources, appropriate governance** and effective participation of agricultural an agri-food chain actors. For this reason, **we are strongly concerned by the approach reflected in the draft ITRE** report, which would replace the European Commission’s proposed window on “Health, Biotech, Agriculture and Bioeconomy” with a broader “Sustainable Prosperity” approach, potentially limiting agriculture and food sectors’ direct access to ECF support. At a time when the EU is seeking to strengthen its strategic autonomy, food security and industrial capacity, **reducing the place of agriculture and food sectors within the ECF would send the wrong political signal and undermine one of Europe’s key strategic** **sectors**. The agri-food chain is not only a beneficiary of competitiveness policies; it is an essential contributor to them. **Excluding agriculture and food from a clear and dedicated place within the ECF would limit the Fund’s ability to deliver on its own objectives**. The **Council’s recent Partial General Approach confirms the Commission’s original approach with a dedicated Window “Health, Biotech, Agriculture and Bioeconomy”**. Similarly, the **AGRI Committee Opinion and the more than 100 cross-party amendments tabled to the draft ITRE report aim to improve the Commission proposal and the draft ITRE Report** by recognising the sector’s full potential to contribute to the ECF’s strategic objectives – from growth, competitiveness, security – and ensuring that agriculture and food are properly integrated into the Fund. We ask the European Parliament to support the above approach: **Investing in the EU’s agriculture and food sectors across the whole agri food chain means investing in Europe’s security, resilience, growth, and its future**. Europe needs to ensure that agriculture and food sectors receive the recognition they require to continue contributing to Europe’s competitiveness and the future of the European project. -END- **Categories:** Press Releases, News **Tags:** Competitiveness --- ### [Who we are: A vital link in the food and feed chain](https://pfp-eu.org/who-we-are-a-vital-link-in-the-food-and-feed-chain/) **Published:** June 17, 2026 **Author:** admin **Categories:** News **Tags:** Brochure --- ### [PFP contribution to EU Vision for Agriculture and Food | 2025](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-contribution-to-eu-vision-for-agriculture-and-food-2025/) **Published:** January 14, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** PFP welcomes the initiative to develop an EU Vision for Agriculture & Food and supports a holistic approach that strengthens dialogue and collaboration across the agrifood value chain. The organisation stresses the importance of ensuring coherence between the future EU food strategy and the Clean Industrial Deal, particularly for industries processing agricultural products. **Massive investment plans will require predictability, policy stability and regulatory coherence in order to maintain the competitiveness of the European agri-food sector.** PFP also welcomes the establishment of the European Board on Agriculture and Food (EBAF) and expressed willingness to contribute as a stakeholder representative. PFP industries rely on a stable supply of safe, high quality European agricultural raw materials at competitive prices. Supporting European farmers is therefore essential for the sustainability of the entire agri-food chain. PFP advocates for a comprehensive value chain approach that increases farmers’ living standards while maintaining the economic sustainability of the processing sector. Successive real term cuts to the CAP budget, administrative burden, fragmented compliance rules, the need for proactive market management and the potential impacts of EU enlargement to Ukraine remain important concerns. PFP therefore recommends increasing the CAP budget in line with inflation, reducing administrative burdens for farmers, strengthening market management mechanisms and conducting robust impact assessments regarding Ukraine accession. PFP considers global trade an essential component of food security and resilience while stressing the importance of maintaining a level playing field for EU producers. The organisation supports the promotion of high EU social, environmental and food safety standards globally, including stronger alignment through Codex and WTO compliant measures. **The EU should remain vigilant against dumped or subsidised imports that distort competition with European farmers and primary food processors.** PFP also highlights that border tariffs remain important for protecting strategic EU agri-food production against imports produced under lower standards. Primary food processing facilities face many of the same decarbonisation challenges as heavy industry. PFP calls for a market based and harmonised framework that rewards carbon reduction and carbon removals. Process electrification remains essential for reducing emissions but continues to face barriers including high electricity prices, insufficient infrastructure and lengthy permitting procedures. Access to long term competitive electricity pricing, accelerated grid expansion, simplified permitting and reduced energy levies will all be necessary to support industrial transformation. The energetic use of primary food processing residues represents another important pathway for carbon reduction and renewable energy development. This approach aligns closely with the objectives of the Clean Industrial Deal and RED III sustainability requirements. PFP also stresses that current EU funding programmes focus too heavily on innovative technologies while many primary food processing decarbonisation pathways depend on mature technologies. Greater support for both CAPEX and OPEX, together with funding for mature decarbonisation solutions and the creation of a European competitiveness fund, would significantly accelerate progress. PFP further calls for the Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act (IDAA) to fully address the needs of energy intensive primary food processing industries and avoid overlooking their strategic importance within Europe’s industrial ecosystem. **PFP calls for the creation of an EU Food Investment & Resilience Plan to strengthen research, innovation and competitiveness across the value chain.** The organisation advocates for stronger accessibility to knowledge, technological innovation and research investment throughout the agri-food value chain. This includes strengthening the European Protein Strategy, supporting an ambitious Bioeconomy Strategy revision, promoting greater valorisation of food and non-food synergies and expanding opportunities for bio-based products and green chemistry. PFP also stresses that agricultural yields and sustainability require farmers to have access to a full toolbox adapted to their crop and region. This includes proportionate legislation for New Genomic Techniques, science based food safety regulation, wider adoption of digital and AI powered agriculture and carbon markets that complement rather than replace CAP direct payments. **Categories:** Position Papers **Tags:** Competitiveness, Food regulatory issues, Sustainability of the supply chain, Cap and market instruments --- ### [PFP expectations from the EU Clean Industrial Deal | 2025](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-expectations-from-the-eu-clean-industrial-deal-2025/) **Published:** February 21, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** **21 February 2025 • REF: 25PFP002** PFP represents the European primary food processing industry, a vital link in the food chain that delivers safe, high quality food products while supporting food security, rural economies and industrial competitiveness across Europe. The industry processes approximately 220 million tonnes of agricultural raw materials every year and directly employs more than 120,000 people. **Primary Food Processors are critical partners for EU farmers, the decarbonisation of the EU food system and food security in Europe.** PFP welcomes the development of a Clean Industrial Deal and calls for energy, climate, trade, agriculture, regulatory and innovation policies that support the competitiveness and long term sustainability of Europe’s primary food processing industry. The organisation stresses that primary food processing installations face many of the same decarbonisation challenges as heavy industry. As a result, PFP is calling for a dedicated Action Plan for the Food Industry that recognises the sector’s strategic importance within Europe’s industrial and food systems. **PFP calls for the agri food industry to be recognised as a priority sector in the Clean Industrial Deal alongside steel, metal and chemical industries.** PFP identifies three major drivers of industrial carbon reduction. The first is process electrification, which requires competitive long term electricity contracts, expanded grid infrastructure, simplified permitting procedures and lower taxes, tariffs and energy levies. The second is the energetic use of residues, allowing food processing by products to contribute to renewable energy generation while supporting the objectives of RED III and the Clean Industrial Deal. The third is adequate public funding, including support for both mature and innovative technologies, fair access to funding across Member States and the creation of a European competitiveness fund. The organisation also calls for easier access to public funding through permanent support services, simplified application procedures and flexible mechanisms capable of responding to changing project costs during the early stages of decarbonisation investments. PFP believes that the forthcoming Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act should address the needs of all energy intensive industries, including primary food processors. Although relatively small in size compared with some industrial sectors, primary food processing occupies a central position within the agri food value chain and plays an essential role in food sovereignty, supply chain resilience and industrial competitiveness. **Primary food processing sits at the centre of the agri food value chain and is critical for European food sovereignty and industrial competitiveness.** To accelerate decarbonisation and industrial transformation, PFP recommends reducing electricity prices, supporting process electrification, creating a dedicated Action Plan for the Food Industry, accelerating grid connections through simplified permitting, increasing funding opportunities for both mature and innovative technologies, and establishing new support mechanisms through the Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act. The organisation also emphasises the importance of research, development and innovation. It calls for stronger access to knowledge, technology transfer, education, legal certainty and research investment. Particular attention should be given to implementing the European Protein Strategy, strengthening the Bioeconomy Strategy, expanding food and non food synergies, and supporting alternative markets such as green chemistry and biofuels. PFP further advocates for improved planning and implementation of research and innovation solutions, including the creation of an EU Food Investment & Resilience Plan. The organisation considers stronger support for bio based products, circular economy initiatives and resource efficiency essential to maintaining long term competitiveness. Global trade remains a key component of food security and resilience. PFP therefore supports policies that maintain a level playing field for European agriculture and food production while encouraging sustainability and competitiveness in international markets. **The EU should remain vigilant against dumped or subsidised imports that distort competition with EU farmers and primary food processors.** The organisation calls for stronger cooperation with third countries to improve sustainability standards, a vigilant approach toward unfair trade practices, balanced and reciprocal tariff liberalisation, and greater international harmonisation of environmental, social and food safety standards. PFP brings together the European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association, the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), and the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Position Papers, News **Tags:** Competitiveness --- ### [Registrations for the 2025 PFP Forum are now open | 2025](https://pfp-eu.org/registrations-for-the-2025-pfp-forum-are-now-open-2025/) **Published:** April 1, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** **INVITATION** From Field to Market: Unlocking the Competitive Edge of Primary Food Processing April 29th, 2025 | 15:00 to 17:00 hrs (CET) followed by a cocktail reception Residence Palace, Brussels Primary Food Processors are a vital link between agriculture and consumers. We transform agricultural raw materials into high-quality food ingredients, animal feed, and biobased products that support the EU bioeconomy. As key players in the EU’s food, feed, and industrial value chains, we help safeguard food security, strengthen sovereignty, drive innovation, and sustain rural economies. However, primary food processing sectors face increasing global competition, price volatility, and the challenges of decarbonization. By keeping our competitiveness high on the EU agenda, we can ensure a robust, sustainable, and secure food supply chain for Europe. Join us for a high-level discussion with policy makers and key stakeholders, moderated by Natasha Foote, on how to maintain the competitive edge of EU primary food processing and shape the future of this essential sector. The event will be followed by a cocktail reception. **Categories:** News **Tags:** Competitiveness --- ### [Wageningen Social and Economic Research study: Primary food processors in the EU - an essential and efficient engine of the food chain (External Link) | 2025](https://pfp-eu.org/wageningen-social-and-economic-research-study-primary-food-processors-in-the-eu-an-essential-and-efficient-engine-of-the-food-chain-external-link-2025/) **Published:** April 12, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** Research commissioned by Primary Food Processors Europe and conducted by Wageningen Social & Economic Research highlights the strategic importance of primary food processing within Europe’s food chain and bioeconomy. The study focuses on six major sectors: vegetable oils, vegetable proteins, flour milling, starch products, sugar, and cocoa. **The report concludes that primary food processing remains one of the least visible yet most strategically important parts of the European food system.** According to the research, primary food processors handle approximately 248.3 million tonnes of agricultural commodities each year, of which 223.5 million tonnes originate within the European Union. The sector generated €78 billion in production value in 2023, representing around 7% of the total value of EU food manufacturing. It directly supports more than 137,500 jobs and contributes to approximately 1.17 million indirect agricultural jobs. The industry encompasses a diverse range of activities. Vegetable oil processors transform rapeseed, soybeans and sunflower seeds into edible oils, biodiesel and feed ingredients. Vegetable protein producers manufacture protein concentrates and plant based ingredients. Flour millers process cereals into flour products, while the starch sector supplies ingredients used in food, pharmaceutical and industrial applications. Sugar processors convert sugar beet and sugar cane into sugar, bioethanol and biomethane, while cocoa processors transform imported cocoa beans into ingredients for confectionery production. The study notes that the sector has undergone increasing consolidation over the past decade, improving operational efficiency and economies of scale. Approximately 3,000 companies now generate around 90% of total industry output across Europe. **Approximately 3,000 companies generate around 90% of the industry’s total output.** Production volumes vary significantly by sector. Sugar processing represents the largest share at 110.7 million tonnes annually, followed by vegetable oils at 50.6 million tonnes and flour milling at 47 million tonnes. Together, these sectors account for the majority of Europe’s primary food processing activity. The employment impact of the industry extends well beyond processing facilities. In addition to more than 137,500 direct jobs, the sector supports nearly 1.2 million agricultural jobs through demand for crops and raw materials. Vegetable oils, flour milling, vegetable proteins, starches and sugar all contribute significantly to farm level employment throughout Europe. The report identifies several competitive strengths, including large scale processing efficiency, strong domestic demand, reliable sourcing networks, high food safety standards, technical expertise and growing investment in sustainability initiatives. Many companies are investing in biomethane, biomass boilers, regenerative agriculture and bio based materials to support decarbonisation objectives. **The industry is increasingly investing in biomethane, biomass boilers, regenerative agriculture and bio based materials to support decarbonisation goals.** At the same time, the study identifies a number of structural challenges. Low profit margins leave the sector highly exposed to energy and commodity price volatility. Many industrial processes remain energy intensive, climate change is increasing pressure on agricultural yields, and growing regulatory requirements create significant compliance costs. The report also notes that the sector often receives limited visibility in policy discussions despite its importance to food security and industrial competitiveness. Looking ahead, Wageningen identifies several major opportunities, including growth in plant based foods, expansion of the bioeconomy, climate smart agriculture, digitalisation and advances in crop breeding technologies. These developments could improve resource efficiency, productivity and sustainability across the food system. However, the study also warns of significant risks, including persistently high European energy costs, uncertainty around industrial decarbonisation pathways, geopolitical instability, commodity price volatility, growing competition from lower cost producers and increasingly complex regulatory requirements. **The report warns that unclear decarbonisation pathways combined with rising compliance costs may threaten the long term competitiveness of EU primary food processing industries.** Overall, the study concludes that primary food processors remain a critical but often overlooked pillar of Europe’s food security, rural economy and bioeconomy. It calls for greater policy recognition, more predictable regulation, stronger support for decarbonisation investments, competitiveness safeguards and balanced sustainability transitions. **Categories:** News **Tags:** Competitiveness --- ### [A Year-End Open Letter: Europe’s Primary Food Processors Warn of Rising Competitiveness Pressures | 2025](https://pfp-eu.org/a-year-end-open-letter-europes-primary-food-processors-warn-of-rising-competitiveness-pressures-2025/) **Published:** December 17, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** As presidents of organisations representing Europe’s primary food processing industry, we close the year with a clear and united assessment of our sector’s viability. The resilience of primary processing is essential for Europe’s food security, rural economies and the strategic autonomy the EU seeks to strengthen. The pressures we face have shifted from temporary strain to structural pressure, with serious consequences for future investment, production and food security. A study conducted with Wageningen University shows that raw material processing in sugar, starch, cocoa and flour has contracted since 2022 due to higher input prices, weakening consumer demand and increasing climate related volatility. At the same time, economic viability is eroding. Real turnover has fallen by nearly 10% since 2021, highlighting a significant loss of competitiveness and financial resilience. **The resilience of primary processing is essential for Europe’s food security, rural economies and strategic autonomy.** Primary food processors convert over 220 million tonnes of agricultural commodities each year into essential ingredients, generating €70 billion in turnover and supporting more than one million farming families and 120,000 industrial jobs. This first industrial link is indispensable to Europe’s food security, rural economies and the functioning of downstream food and feed supply chains. However, rising production costs, decarbonisation pressures and intensified global competition are undermining the viability of these operations. At the same time, the sector is not recognised within EU industrial policy frameworks, limiting access to state aid, transition finance and accelerated permitting mechanisms. If this trend continues, Europe risks losing its processing capacity, shifting value creation outside the EU and increasing dependence on imported processed ingredients. **Europe cannot strengthen food security while allowing its primary processing capacity to decline.** We urge the European Commission, Member States and the European Parliament to take decisive action and ensure that primary processing can remain competitive and continue delivering for Europe’s food system. Primary processors and farmers are equally essential and interdependent parts of the EU food supply chain and should benefit from competitive and predictable operating conditions. Europe also needs a competitiveness focused decarbonisation framework that reflects the sector’s unique characteristics, including rurality, seasonality and thin operating margins. Reducing Europe’s structural energy cost disadvantage must remain a priority through access to affordable clean energy and accelerated infrastructure development. Primary food processors should also be recognised within EU industrial policy frameworks and included in strategic value chain initiatives. Finally, regulatory predictability and reduced compliance burdens are necessary to support sustainable and competitive food production. **Affordable energy, regulatory predictability and industrial recognition are essential for maintaining Europe’s food processing capacity.** We stand ready to work with EU institutions to ensure that Europe retains the industrial capacity essential to feeding its citizens. However, urgent action is required. NameOrganisationGiovanni TamburiniCEFS PresidentEmiel Van DijkECA Board MemberFrancesco VacondioEFM PresidentChristophe LescroartStarch Europe PresidentSophie VerpoortEUVEPRO PresidentChristophe BeaunoirFEDIOL President--- The Primary Food Processors of the EU (PFP) brings together the European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers), the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), and the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** News **Tags:** Competitiveness --- ### [A Year-End Open Letter: Europe’s Primary Food Processors Warn of Rising Competitiveness Pressures](https://pfp-eu.org/a-year-end-open-letter-europes-primary-food-processors-warn-of-rising-competitiveness-pressures/) **Published:** December 17, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** The presidents of Europe’s primary food processing organisations issued a joint year end open letter warning that the sector is moving from temporary economic strain into long term structural pressure. The resilience of primary processing remains essential for Europe’s food security, rural economies, and strategic autonomy. **The resilience of primary processing is essential for Europe’s food security, rural economies and strategic autonomy.** The letter references research commissioned from Wageningen University showing that raw material processing volumes in the sugar, starch, cocoa, and flour sectors have contracted since 2022 due to rising input costs, weaker consumer demand, and increasing climate related volatility. According to the findings, real turnover across the sector has fallen by nearly 10% since 2021, signalling a significant decline in competitiveness and financial resilience. Primary food processors convert agricultural commodities into essential food and feed ingredients that support the wider European food chain. Together, the sector processes more than 220 million tonnes of raw materials annually, generates approximately €70 billion in turnover, directly employs more than 120,000 people, and supports over one million farming families across Europe. **Primary food processing is the first industrial link that keeps Europe’s food value chains functioning.** The sector faces a combination of structural challenges including rising energy costs, increasing operational expenses, raw material volatility, growing decarbonisation requirements, stronger competition from international producers operating under lower environmental and regulatory standards, and a continued lack of recognition within EU industrial policy frameworks. As a result, primary food processors often face barriers to accessing state aid, transition financing, and accelerated permitting mechanisms. PFP warns that continued deterioration in competitiveness could result in the loss of EU processing capacity, the relocation of value creation outside Europe, weaker rural economies, greater dependence on imported processed ingredients, and reduced food security and strategic autonomy. **Protecting primary processing is considered essential for safeguarding Europe’s food security, competitiveness and industrial sovereignty.** PFP is calling on the European Commission, the European Parliament, and Member States to begin 2026 with a clear commitment to supporting Europe’s primary food processing industry. The organisation stresses that farmers and primary processors are equally essential and interconnected parts of the EU food chain. It also calls for competitiveness proof decarbonisation policies that recognise rurality, seasonality, and thin operating margins while supporting long term resilience. The organisation further urges policymakers to reduce Europe’s structural energy cost disadvantage, ensure access to affordable clean energy, include primary food processors within strategic industrial initiatives, reduce unnecessary compliance burdens, and create stable long term policy conditions that encourage investment. **Affordable clean energy and faster infrastructure development are critical for the future viability of EU primary food processing industries.** PFP emphasises that Europe must urgently close the competitiveness gap with global producers by reducing structural energy disadvantages and accelerating industrial transition infrastructure. The organisation argues that the regulatory framework should enable farmers and processors to continue delivering sustainable, competitive, and affordable food for European citizens. NameOrganisationGiovanni TamburiniCEFS PresidentEmiel Van DijkECA Board MemberFrancesco VacondioEFM PresidentChristophe LescroartStarch Europe PresidentSophie VerpoortEUVEPRO PresidentChristophe BeaunoirFEDIOL PresidentPFP brings together the European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association, the European Starch Industry Association, the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), and the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL). **PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union.** **Categories:** Press Releases **Tags:** Competitiveness --- ### [An ambitious EU competitiveness agenda must place the future of the European agri-food chain at its core (Joint Statement) | 2026](https://pfp-eu.org/an-ambitious-eu-competitiveness-agenda-must-place-the-future-of-the-european-agri-food-chain-at-its-core-joint-statement-2026/) **Published:** February 11, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** **11 February 2026** Agriculture and food have always been at the heart of the European project, a pillar of our economy, our security and our way of life. It is a strategic sector of the economy, be it at EU or national level. Taken together, the entire agrifood value chain generates more than €1 trillion in gross value added to the EU economy, surpassing the economic footprint of other EU industries. Every day, Europe’s farmers and the entire agri-food chain provide citizens with safe, high-quality and nutritious food, both across the continent and beyond. In a world shaped by geopolitical instability, conflict and uncertainty, farmers and all actors along the value chain remain a stabilising force and a strategic asset for food security, resilience, sustainability, culture and peace. **The sector’s potential to contribute to the EU’s strategic goals ranging from economic competitiveness to security must be recognized.** Yet the agri-food sector is under increasing strain. Global uncertainty, legal uncertainty, growing regulatory complexity, outdated rules that hinder innovation, and rising administrative burdens are putting entire value chains at risk. These obstacles delay essential investments, weaken resilience, slow innovation and make it harder to deliver the transitions society expects. Now more than ever, Europe must strengthen its strategic independence and security by investing in its agriculture and food sector. This means securing agricultural productivity and reliable supplies across all regions of the EU, ensuring food remains affordable for consumers, preserving the diversity of production, assuring generation renewal, maintaining highest quality and safety standards, and contributing to Europe’s overall growth and preparedness. Strengthening the agri-food sector also means reinforcing Europe’s bioeconomy and circularity, where farmers and competitive agri-based industry play a key role in reducing strategic dependencies on fossil-based and imported inputs. The signatory organisations of the agri-food chain welcome the European Commission’s 2024–2029 commitment to boost competitiveness by reducing administrative burdens, streamlining procedures and modernising legislation. The time has come to make a real difference in the daily lives of millions of farmers, agri-cooperatives and hundreds of thousands of processors and operators, by providing the clarity and predictability businesses need to operate, invest and innovate, while reinforcing consumer confidence. **Achieving the objectives of the Vision for Agriculture and Food requires genuine simplification, innovation and practical solutions across the entire value chain.** As highlighted in the European Commission’s Vision for Agriculture and Food, achieving its objectives requires genuine simplification for farmers, food processors and all actors across the value chain, supported by innovation that delivers practical, scalable solutions. Initial steps have already been taken through some Omnibus proposals. This is a move in the right direction, but more must be done to unlock the full potential of the agri-food chain. The Omnibus process must continue. EU institutions must go further by modernising legislation that discourages innovation, slows down permitting, and limits circularity. Europe should aim to become the global leader in smart, streamlined regulation, enabling businesses to compete on world markets and ensuring a well-functioning Single Market. **If Europe is committed to strengthening its strategic independence, it must start with agriculture and food.** Reducing strategic dependencies and reinforcing competitiveness in agriculture and the agri-food sector are essential foundations of a truly resilient Europe. Simplification, modernisation and investment in the competitiveness of farming and the entire agri-food chain must be placed at the centre of the EU agenda. Investing in the EU agri-food chain means investing in Europe’s common security and geopolitical resilience. The time to deliver is now. We call on EU leaders to hear the voice of the agri-food chain and take concrete action with the policies and investments needed to secure the future, resilience and competitiveness of the entire sector. **Categories:** News **Tags:** Competitiveness --- ### [Industrial Accelerator Act: A positive first step, but Primary Food Processing must be recognised as strategic | 2026](https://pfp-eu.org/industrial-accelerator-act-a-positive-first-step-but-primary-food-processing-must-be-recognised-as-strategic-2026/) **Published:** March 5, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** EU Primary Food Processors (PFP) welcome the European Commission’s proposal for an Industrial Accelerator Act and, in particular, the intention to facilitate and speed up permitting procedures for industrial projects across the European Union. Faster, clearer, and more predictable permitting processes are essential to enable primary food processing companies to invest in decarbonisation, efficiency, and innovation. Primary food processing industries are already undertaking significant investments to reduce emissions, improve competitiveness, and strengthen the resilience of Europe’s agri-food value chain. Streamlined permitting procedures will help accelerate these efforts and support Europe’s broader competitiveness and climate objectives. PFP equally welcome the recognition of bioeconomy as a catalyst for sustainable bio-based solutions for industrial production. Bio-based products can be instrumental in strengthening the EU’s strategic value chains. To remain competitive, the EU must also support research and development beyond food products. This includes exploring bio-based materials, green chemistry, and biofuels – areas that can create new markets for farmers and industry alike. However, PFP regret that food processing is not included among the strategic sectors listed in Annex I of the proposal. This omission risks overlooking the critical role that primary food processors play in Europe’s industrial and food security landscape, at a time when geopolitical disorders imperil the functioning of our various supply chains. Primary food processing industries transform European agricultural raw materials into essential food ingredients and products that underpin the entire food supply chain. These energy-intensive operations are facing significant decarbonisation challenges while ensuring the continuity, affordability, and safety of food production across the EU. Recognising food processing as a strategic sector would better reflect its importance to Europe’s economic resilience, rural value chains, and food security. It would also help ensure that investments needed to decarbonise and modernise the sector can be delivered at the pace required. PFP President Giovanni Tamburini said: “PFP calls on Members of the European Parliament and Member States to address this oversight during the legislative process and ensure that primary food processing is duly recognised in Annex I of the Industrial Accelerator Act. Such recognition would send a strong signal that Europe values the industries that transform its agricultural production into the food and ingredients that sustain its citizens every day.” The [Primary Food Processors of the EU (PFP) is composed of:](/about/) - [European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS)](http://www.cefs.org/) - [European Cocoa Association (ECA)](http://www.eurococoa.com/) - [European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers)](http://www.flourmillers.eu/) - [European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe)](http://www.starch.eu/) - [European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO)](http://www.euvepro.eu/) - [European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL)](http://www.fediol.eu/) PFP members process approximately 220 million tons of raw materials (cereals, sugar beet, rapeseeds, soybeans, sunflower seeds, crude vegetable oil, cocoa beans, starch potatoes) and employ over 120,000 people in the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases, News **Tags:** Energy --- ### [Press Release: Primary Food Processors call for an ambitious Industrial Accelerator Act leveraging their decarbonisation potential without delay | 2025](https://pfp-eu.org/press-release-primary-food-processors-call-for-an-ambitious-industrial-accelerator-act-leveraging-their-decarbonisation-potential-without-delay-2025-2/) **Published:** December 11, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** **11 December 2025** The Primary Food Processors (PFP) regret the last minute postponement of the long awaited European Commission proposal for an Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act and call for the urgent finalisation and publication of this critical initiative. Primary food processing installations are industrial facilities facing many of the same decarbonisation challenges as heavy industry sectors across Europe. PFP highlights several carbon reduction pathways that are critical for the sector’s transition. These include accelerating industrial electrification through faster permitting procedures, electricity grid expansion, and lower energy costs; mobilising accessible public funding for decarbonisation investments, including support for mature technologies that are often overlooked; and supporting the energetic use of residues in line with the EU Bioeconomy Strategy and the Renewable Energy Directive. **Primary food processors need faster electrification, accessible funding, and recognition of residue based energy solutions to accelerate decarbonisation.** PFP fully supports the objectives outlined in the Clean Industrial Deal and urges the European Commission to take into account the adaptation efforts and operational realities of the agri food sector. According to the association, maintaining the long term sustainability of Europe’s primary food processing industries is essential for protecting EU supply chains and ensuring food security across the European Union. PFP also calls for energy, climate, regulatory, and innovation frameworks that actively support the competitiveness and transformation of EU primary food processing industries. **The long term competitiveness of Europe’s food supply chain depends on a decarbonisation framework that reflects the realities of primary food processing industries.** --- The Primary Food Processors of the EU (PFP) brings together the European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers), the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), and the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials, including cereals, sugar beet, rapeseeds, soybeans, sunflower seeds, crude vegetable oil, cocoa products, and starch potatoes, employing more than 120,000 people across the European Union. Official website: [www.pfp-eu.org](https://www.pfp-eu.org) **Categories:** Press Releases, News --- ### [PFP position on food waste - July 2019 | 2019](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-position-on-food-waste-july-2019-2019/) **Published:** July 12, 2019 **Author:** admin **Content:** **12 July 2019** Primary Food Processors (PFP) welcomed European initiatives aimed at improving sustainability and reducing food waste across the food supply chain while expressing concerns regarding the inclusion of several primary food processing sectors within the European Commission’s proposed methodology for measuring food waste. The organisation supports the objective of developing a harmonised European framework for food waste reporting but argues that the methodology should accurately reflect the realities of primary food processing operations and the legal definition of food waste. **PFP maintains that several primary food processing sectors generate little to no actual food waste because all raw material components are valorised through food, feed or industrial applications.** According to PFP, products can only be considered food waste if they first meet the legal definition of food. Materials that are not edible, are not intended for human consumption or were never designed to become food products should therefore not be classified as food waste. The association emphasised that primary food processing industries have long operated highly efficient production systems that maximise the use of agricultural raw materials. Through integrated processing models, co products and by products are redirected into animal feed, pharmaceuticals, bio based materials, cosmetics, fuels and numerous industrial applications. PFP argues that this approach significantly reduces waste generation while supporting circular economy objectives and resource efficiency throughout the value chain. **Primary food processors utilise agricultural raw materials across multiple food, feed and industrial markets, resulting in extremely high levels of resource efficiency.** The organisation called on the European Commission to reconsider the inclusion of cereals, cocoa, sugar and vegetable oil processing sectors within mandatory food waste measurement requirements. According to PFP, such reporting obligations would measure waste streams that do not represent food waste and would create unnecessary administrative burdens without generating meaningful environmental benefits. PFP also warned against the misclassification of industrial co products and secondary outputs as food waste. Many materials generated during processing are intentionally directed towards feed, bioeconomy and industrial markets and therefore remain valuable resources rather than waste. The association provided examples from several sectors. Cocoa processing generates products used in food, feed, pharmaceuticals and packaging applications. Sugar processing fully valorises sugar beet components through food, feed and industrial uses. Vegetable oil processors utilise all components of oilseeds, while starch and flour industries direct raw material fractions into multiple food and non food markets. **PFP argues that mandatory reporting should focus on genuine food waste rather than valuable co products that continue to serve economic and industrial purposes.** According to the organisation, introducing reporting obligations where no meaningful food waste exists risks increasing compliance costs while providing limited environmental value. PFP therefore advocates for a more targeted and proportionate approach that reflects the operational realities of primary food processing industries. The association concluded that food waste policies should support sustainability objectives while recognising the substantial contribution primary food processors already make to resource efficiency, circular economy principles and full raw material utilisation. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Position Papers, News **Tags:** Food regulatory issues --- ### [PFP statement on ECJ ruling on mutagenesis | 2019](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-statement-on-ecj-ruling-on-mutagenesis-2019/) **Published:** December 1, 2019 **Author:** admin **Content:** **December 2019** Primary Food Processors (PFP) took note of the European Court of Justice ruling in Case C-528/16 concerning mutagenesis techniques and their treatment under European GMO legislation. The organisation highlighted the need for greater legal certainty and regulatory clarity regarding products developed through modern plant breeding methods. According to the ruling, organisms obtained through newer mutagenesis techniques are considered genetically modified organisms under Directive 2001/18 and are therefore subject to EU GMO legislation. Organisms produced through conventional mutagenesis methods with a long safety record remain exempt, although Member States may establish their own national measures. **PFP believes the ruling creates significant uncertainty by failing to clearly define the distinction between conventional mutagenesis and newer mutagenesis techniques.** The organisation noted that the Court’s decision differs from the opinion previously expressed by the Advocate General, who had concluded that products obtained through mutagenesis should not be regulated under GMO legislation. PFP expressed concerns regarding the lack of clarity surrounding several key concepts, including the definition of conventional mutagenesis techniques, the scope of newer breeding methods and the powers available to Member States. According to the organisation, this uncertainty could lead to inconsistent implementation across the European Union. The association warned that some Member States could potentially apply GMO requirements to crop varieties developed through mutagenesis techniques that have been used safely and legally for decades. **PFP warns that regulatory uncertainty could create compliance challenges, supply chain disruption and inconsistent implementation across Member States.** The organisation also highlighted concerns regarding imported raw materials and international competitiveness. Many countries outside the European Union do not regulate newer mutagenesis techniques as GMOs, creating a significant divergence between European and international regulatory frameworks. According to PFP, this difference could encourage agricultural production and innovation to move outside Europe while creating additional challenges for sourcing imported raw materials needed by European food and feed industries. PFP further argued that the ruling presents significant enforcement difficulties. Many products developed through gene editing and newer mutagenesis methods may be scientifically indistinguishable from products obtained through conventional breeding or naturally occurring genetic changes. **PFP argues that many gene edited products cannot be reliably distinguished from conventional varieties, making practical enforcement extremely difficult.** The organisation referenced scientific findings indicating that current analytical methods face major limitations in identifying products developed through certain new mutagenesis techniques. PFP also highlighted the potential benefits of plant breeding innovation. These technologies may improve disease resistance, reduce pesticide use, strengthen drought tolerance, support climate adaptation, reduce allergenicity, improve food quality and enhance food safety through lower contamination risks. According to the association, restricting access to these technologies could undermine innovation and reduce the competitiveness of European agriculture and food production. **PFP believes modern plant breeding techniques can support sustainability, climate resilience, food quality and long term food security.** PFP welcomed the Council decision requesting the European Commission to undertake a review of novel genomic techniques and assess whether additional legislative action may be necessary. The organisation concluded that further clarification of EU legislation is essential to provide legal certainty, support innovation and ensure the long term competitiveness of European agri food supply chains. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Position Papers **Tags:** Trade, Food regulatory issues --- ### [PFP Statement on Court Ruling on mutagenesis](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-statement-on-court-ruling-on-mutagenesis/) **Published:** December 6, 2019 **Author:** admin **Content:** **December 2019** Primary Food Processors (PFP) took note of the ruling of the European Court of Justice in case C-528/16 concerning mutagenesis techniques and their treatment under European GMO legislation. The organisation emphasised the need for greater legal clarity and regulatory certainty regarding the status of products developed through newer plant breeding methods. According to the ruling, organisms obtained through newer mutagenesis techniques are considered genetically modified organisms under Directive 2001/18 and are therefore subject to the obligations of existing GMO legislation. At the same time, organisms produced through conventional mutagenesis methods with a long safety record remain exempt, although Member States may introduce their own national measures. **PFP believes the ruling creates significant legal uncertainty regarding the distinction between conventional mutagenesis techniques and newer plant breeding methods.** The organisation noted that the Court’s position differed from the opinion previously expressed by the Advocate General, who had concluded that products obtained through mutagenesis should not be subject to legislation governing genetically modified organisms. PFP expressed concern that the ruling does not clearly define key concepts such as conventional mutagenesis techniques, newer mutagenesis methods or the precise powers available to Member States. According to the organisation, this lack of clarity creates uncertainty for operators throughout the food and feed supply chain. The association warned that differing interpretations among Member States could lead to regulatory fragmentation and potentially affect crop varieties that have been cultivated and traded lawfully for many years. **PFP warns that legal uncertainty could create compliance challenges, regulatory fragmentation and supply chain disruption across the European Union.** PFP also highlighted concerns regarding international competitiveness. The organisation noted that several major agricultural producing regions outside the European Union do not regulate newer mutagenesis techniques in the same manner as traditional GMOs. This divergence may encourage agricultural production and innovation to move outside Europe while creating additional challenges for imports and raw material sourcing. The association further questioned the practical enforceability of the ruling. According to PFP, many products developed through gene editing and newer mutagenesis methods may be indistinguishable from products obtained through conventional breeding or naturally occurring genetic changes. PFP referred to scientific work conducted by the Joint Research Centre indicating that detecting products derived from certain new mutagenesis techniques presents significant technical challenges. **PFP argues that enforcement remains highly problematic because products developed through new mutagenesis techniques may be impossible to distinguish from conventional varieties.** Despite these concerns, PFP welcomed the Council’s request for the European Commission to conduct a study on the legal status of novel genomic techniques and assess whether additional legislative action may be required. The organisation also highlighted the potential benefits of modern plant breeding innovation. These technologies may contribute to improved disease resistance, reduced pesticide use, greater drought tolerance, enhanced climate resilience, lower allergenicity, improved food quality and strengthened food safety. PFP believes that regulatory uncertainty surrounding these technologies risks slowing innovation and reducing the competitiveness of European agriculture and food production. The organisation therefore calls for greater legal clarity and a science based framework capable of supporting innovation while maintaining high safety standards. **PFP supports further clarification of EU legislation to enable innovation, improve competitiveness and unlock the sustainability benefits of modern plant breeding technologies.** PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Position Papers **Tags:** Trade, Food regulatory issues --- ### [PFP-FDE Eurocommerce Guidance on the origin indication of the primary ingredient | 2020](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-fde-eurocommerce-guidance-on-the-origin-indication-of-the-primary-ingredient-2020/) **Published:** May 5, 2020 **Author:** admin **Content:** **May 2020** Primary Food Processors (PFP), FoodDrinkEurope and EuroCommerce jointly developed guidance on the application of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/775, which establishes rules for indicating the country of origin or place of provenance of a food when that origin differs from that of its primary ingredient. The guidance aims to support food business operators, policymakers and national authorities by providing practical interpretations of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 and clarifying when additional origin information must be provided to consumers. **The regulation applies when the origin or place of provenance of a food is indicated and differs from the origin of its primary ingredient.** The guidance explains that two conditions must be met simultaneously for the regulation to apply. First, the origin or place of provenance of the food must be indicated either voluntarily or through mandatory labelling requirements. Second, the origin of the primary ingredient must differ from the declared origin of the food. According to the document, a primary ingredient is generally an ingredient that represents more than 50% of a food or is commonly associated with the product by consumers. The guidance provides examples where origin disclosure requirements may apply, including products marketed with national references, geographical indications, maps, flags or statements such as “Made in Italy” when the primary ingredient originates elsewhere. **Both the presentation of the food and consumer perception must be considered when determining whether origin disclosure requirements apply.** The document also clarifies several situations that are generally excluded from the regulation. These include registered trademarks, protected geographical indications, business names and addresses, identification marks required by EU legislation, and certain customary or generic food names that consumers recognise as product styles rather than indications of origin. Examples cited include product names such as Wiener Schnitzel, American Pancakes, French Nougat, Camembert and Cheddar, which may be understood as traditional product names rather than geographical origin claims. The guidance further outlines the different ways operators may communicate the origin of primary ingredients. These range from broad geographic references such as “EU” or “non-EU” to specific countries, regions, fishing areas or sub national locations. **Food business operators may choose different levels of geographical precision when declaring the origin of primary ingredients.** The document also discusses interpretation issues relating to single ingredient products, foods without a clearly identifiable primary ingredient, geographical symbols and brand names containing geographic references. According to the guidance, origin information should always be assessed in the context of the overall packaging presentation and whether consumers could reasonably interpret the information as an indication of origin. The participating organisations emphasise that origin labelling requirements should be applied consistently across the European Union and in a way that avoids misleading consumers while preserving legal certainty for businesses. **The guidance concludes that origin information should be clear, proportionate and assessed according to overall consumer understanding of the product presentation.** The guidance was jointly developed by Primary Food Processors (PFP), FoodDrinkEurope and EuroCommerce to support the consistent implementation of EU food information legislation. **Categories:** Position Papers, News **Tags:** Food regulatory issues --- ### [PFP Forum 2020 on Climate Change | 2020](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-forum-2020-on-climate-change-2020/) **Published:** October 1, 2020 **Author:** admin **Content:** **14 October 2020** Primary Food Processors (PFP) hosted its 2020 Online Forum under the theme *“Climate Change: Impacts on Primary Food Sectors and Ways Towards Carbon Neutrality”*, bringing together policymakers, industry representatives and sustainability experts to discuss the environmental challenges facing Europe’s primary food processing industries. The event was hosted by Norbert Lins MEP, Chair of the European Parliament Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, at a time when the European Union was increasing its climate ambitions and accelerating efforts to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. **The forum focused on the impacts of climate change on primary food supply chains and the pathways available to achieve carbon neutrality across the sector.** PFP highlighted the growing need to better understand how climate change affects agricultural production, food processing operations and the wider agri food value chain. The organisation stressed that greater awareness and improved knowledge are essential to help primary food processors adapt to future environmental and economic challenges. The forum explored the relationship between climate policy, industrial competitiveness and food security, examining how Europe’s primary food processing industries can contribute to climate objectives while maintaining reliable food production and resilient supply chains. Participants discussed the opportunities and barriers associated with industrial decarbonisation, including the role of technological innovation, infrastructure development, renewable energy solutions and long term policy support. **Speakers emphasised that achieving climate neutrality will require technological innovation, investment, infrastructure improvements and cooperation across the food chain.** Industry representatives also highlighted the importance of understanding the impacts of climate change on agricultural raw material supply chains, particularly for arable farming and other sectors that provide the raw materials used by primary food processors. The programme included presentations on the perspective of the primary food processing industry, opportunities and challenges associated with industrial decarbonisation, and the potential effects of climate change on agricultural commodity supply chains. Following the presentations, participants engaged in a discussion addressing future climate policy, industrial competitiveness, food production resilience and the transition towards a lower carbon economy. **PFP considers climate adaptation and carbon neutrality essential priorities for the future resilience of Europe’s food processing industries.** The organisation reaffirmed its commitment to contributing constructively to Europe’s climate objectives while ensuring that food security, economic sustainability and industrial competitiveness remain central elements of the transition. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of agricultural raw materials annually and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** News --- ### [Primary Food Processors and Climate Change | 2020](https://pfp-eu.org/primary-food-processors-and-climate-change-2020/) **Published:** October 15, 2020 **Author:** admin **Content:** **15 October 2020** Primary Food Processors (PFP) brought together policymakers, industry representatives and sustainability experts during a virtual forum to discuss the challenges and opportunities associated with climate neutrality, industrial competitiveness and decarbonisation within Europe’s primary food processing industries. The discussions took place as the European Union advanced its climate ambitions, including the objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030 and achieving climate neutrality by 2050. **PFP stressed that achieving climate neutrality will require long term investment, technological innovation and a predictable policy environment that supports industrial transformation.** Participants highlighted the strategic role of primary food processors as the link between agriculture and food manufacturing. Speakers emphasised that climate objectives can only be achieved through cooperation across the entire food value chain while ensuring that European industries remain globally competitive. The forum also examined the progress already achieved by primary food processing industries. According to PFP, companies have significantly improved energy efficiency, optimised industrial operations and developed highly resource efficient production systems that maximise the value extracted from agricultural raw materials. **PFP industries have already achieved substantial energy efficiency improvements while operating highly resource efficient production systems.** Despite this progress, the organisation noted that energy consumption remains one of the largest contributors to the environmental footprint of many processing facilities. Further emissions reductions will therefore require major investments in new technologies, upgraded infrastructure and innovative decarbonisation solutions. PFP highlighted several conditions necessary for achieving carbon neutrality, including policy predictability, breakthrough technologies, public investment in energy infrastructure and financial support mechanisms capable of accelerating industrial transition. The organisation warned that long investment cycles and capital intensive production facilities require regulatory certainty in order to support future decarbonisation decisions. **Long term policy certainty and investment support are essential for enabling industrial decarbonisation across primary food processing sectors.** The forum also examined findings from Life Cycle Analysis studies conducted across several primary food processing sectors. These studies showed that agricultural production often represents the largest share of a product’s overall carbon footprint, highlighting the importance of collaboration between processors and farmers. PFP stressed that meaningful progress towards climate neutrality will require stronger cooperation throughout the food chain and greater support for farmers implementing sustainable production practices. The organisation emphasised that farm level action plays a critical role in reducing overall food chain emissions and that climate objectives cannot be achieved without adequate financial and technical support for agricultural producers. **Life Cycle Analysis studies indicate that agricultural production is often the largest contributor to the carbon footprint of primary food products.** PFP concluded that climate neutrality and industrial competitiveness must progress together. The organisation believes that innovation, investment and cooperation across the food value chain will be essential to achieving Europe’s environmental ambitions while maintaining food security and economic resilience. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of agricultural raw materials annually and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases --- ### [PFP POSITION ON FARM TO FORK STRATEGY | 2020](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-position-on-farm-to-fork-strategy-2020/) **Published:** October 25, 2020 **Author:** admin **Content:** **October 2020** Primary Food Processors (PFP) welcomed the European Commission’s Farm to Fork Strategy and expressed support for its objective of creating more sustainable food systems across Europe. At the same time, the organisation stressed that implementation must remain science based, economically viable and capable of preserving food security, food safety and competitiveness throughout the agri food chain. PFP noted that the COVID 19 pandemic highlighted the strategic importance of resilient food supply chains, stable agricultural production and secure access to food across the European Union. According to the organisation, these principles should remain central to all future sustainability initiatives. **PFP supports the transition towards more sustainable food systems while emphasising the importance of science based policymaking, food security and economic viability.** PFP represents six major primary food processing sectors that transform agricultural raw materials into food, feed and non food ingredients used throughout European value chains. Together, these industries process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials annually, employ more than 120,000 people directly and support around one million indirect jobs. The organisation considers primary food processors key contributors to Europe’s sustainability objectives and believes that the sector can play an important role in advancing circular economy principles, resource efficiency and bio based innovation. **PFP considers primary food processors key enablers of sustainable food systems and the wider European bioeconomy.** The association identified several principles that should guide implementation of the Farm to Fork Strategy. These include maintaining high food safety standards, protecting food security, ensuring science based decision making and preserving the economic sustainability of farmers, processors and other supply chain actors. PFP also outlined a number of policy priorities. The organisation supports a Common Agricultural Policy that strengthens farmer incomes while contributing to climate objectives and Single Market stability. It also argues that pesticide reduction targets should progress at a realistic pace and only where effective alternatives are available. According to PFP, Integrated Pest Management measures should be accompanied by appropriate transition periods to avoid disruptions to agricultural production, while organic farming targets should remain market driven and economically achievable. **PFP supports sustainability objectives but believes implementation measures must remain realistic, achievable and supported by viable alternatives.** The organisation strongly supports the development of New Genomic Techniques (NGTs), arguing that these technologies can improve crop resilience, reduce dependence on pesticides, enhance food quality and help agriculture adapt to climate change. PFP therefore calls for a modern regulatory framework that reflects current scientific knowledge and innovation opportunities. PFP also supports harmonised nutrition labelling at EU level provided that such systems are science based, easy for consumers to understand and do not create confusion. At the same time, the organisation opposes mandatory country of origin labelling requirements for primary processed ingredients, arguing that quality is determined by production expertise and processing know how rather than geographic origin alone. **PFP believes innovation, including New Genomic Techniques, will be essential for achieving long term sustainability objectives.** On food waste, PFP emphasises that non edible materials and materials never intended for human consumption should not be classified as food waste. The organisation argues that primary food processors maximise the use of raw materials through food, feed and industrial applications, resulting in highly efficient resource utilisation. PFP further stressed that all future Farm to Fork initiatives should be supported by comprehensive impact assessments covering food safety, food security, economic sustainability, operational feasibility and potential trade implications. The organisation concluded that the Farm to Fork Strategy can only achieve its objectives if innovation, scientific evidence, competitiveness, food security and practical implementation frameworks remain at the centre of policymaking. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials annually, employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union and support around one million indirect jobs throughout associated value chains. **Categories:** Position Papers, News **Tags:** Sustainability of the supply chain --- ### [PFP Statement on the draft German “Mineral oil ordinance” | 2020](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-statement-on-the-draft-german-mineral-oil-ordinance-2020/) **Published:** November 25, 2020 **Author:** admin **Content:** **November 2020** Primary Food Processors (PFP) expressed strong concerns regarding the draft 22nd Ordinance amending the German Consumer Goods Ordinance and called for a harmonised, science based European approach to addressing Mineral Oil Aromatic Hydrocarbons (MOAH) in food. The proposal notified by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture under the Technical Regulation Information System (TRIS) seeks to amend Article 6 of the German Consumer Goods Ordinance concerning food contact materials made from paper, paperboard and cardboard containing recycled paper. **The proposed ordinance would require a functional barrier ensuring that no MOAH migration into food exceeds a detection threshold of 0.5 mg/kg.** PFP joined other stakeholders in expressing concerns regarding the proposal and stressed that consumer protection and the free movement of goods within the European Single Market should be achieved through a uniform, proportionate and scientifically robust European framework rather than through divergent national legislation. The organisation noted that MOAH contamination may originate from multiple sources throughout production and processing chains. According to PFP, packaging is not always the source of contamination, products may already contain contamination before packaging, and functional barriers alone cannot eliminate all contamination pathways. PFP also highlighted that industry has already implemented numerous measures to address mineral oil contamination risks, including sector guidelines, industry toolboxes, best practices and benchmark values developed through cooperation across the value chain. **PFP argued that existing industry measures, best practices and monitoring activities already contribute significantly to managing contamination risks.** The organisation further warned that important analytical challenges remain unresolved. Industry studies and proficiency tests indicate that detecting MOAH near the proposed threshold remains highly complex, with risks of false positive results, analytical uncertainty and difficulties associated with complex food matrices. PFP noted that no official analytical method currently exists that can reliably determine the precise source of contamination or distinguish between the various possible MOAH entry routes. The association also expressed concerns regarding the economic consequences of the proposal. According to PFP, implementation could create substantial compliance costs for manufacturers and importers, introduce additional barriers to trade, increase regulatory fragmentation and negatively affect the functioning of the European Single Market. **PFP warned that national legislation could create market fragmentation, increase compliance costs and restrict the free movement of goods within the European Union.** PFP further argued that the proposal is not sufficiently aligned with ongoing European initiatives and scientific work. The organisation pointed to ongoing EU monitoring programmes, EFSA risk assessment activities and future legislative reviews already planned under the Farm to Fork Strategy. The association also highlighted potential conflicts with European sustainability objectives. Increased reliance on barrier materials and composite packaging solutions could undermine circular economy goals, recycling targets and broader environmental objectives established under the European Green Deal. PFP therefore called for a coordinated European framework based on scientific evidence, proportionality and harmonisation rather than fragmented national approaches. **PFP supports a harmonised, science based European solution that protects consumers while preserving sustainability objectives and the integrity of the Single Market.** PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Position Papers **Tags:** Food regulatory issues --- ### [PFP industries concerned over €2 billion worth of traded goods across the Channel in the balance of inconclusive negotiations | 2020](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-industries-concerned-over-e2-billion-worth-of-traded-goods-across-the-channel-in-the-balance-of-inconclusive-negotiations-2020/) **Published:** December 4, 2020 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 4 December 2020** Primary Food Processors (PFP) warned that a no deal Brexit scenario would severely disrupt EU UK food supply chains and place more than €2 billion worth of annual agri food trade at risk. As negotiations approached the end of the Brexit transition period, the organisation called for an ambitious trade agreement that would preserve quota free and duty free trade between the European Union and the United Kingdom. PFP highlighted the deep integration of food and agricultural supply chains between both markets and warned that continued uncertainty was already creating operational and commercial risks for businesses across Europe’s primary food processing industries. **PFP called for a comprehensive free trade agreement with zero tariffs and zero quotas to avoid disruption to long established EU UK food supply chains.** The organisation noted that annual exports from the European Union to the United Kingdom exceeded three million tonnes of products worth approximately €1.7 billion, while imports from the United Kingdom exceeded one million tonnes worth approximately €637 million. Together, these trade flows represented more than €2.3 billion in annual economic activity. PFP warned that the absence of a trade agreement could introduce tariffs, customs barriers and additional administrative burdens that would significantly affect the competitiveness of European food processing industries and their trading partners. **PFP estimated that approximately €2.33 billion in annual trade flows could be affected by a no deal Brexit outcome.** The association also requested a transition adjustment period of at least six months to allow businesses sufficient time to adapt to new customs procedures, regulatory requirements, rules of origin and product labelling obligations. According to PFP, a phased implementation period would help reduce disruption and preserve supply chain continuity. The organisation highlighted a number of key risks associated with a no deal scenario, including increased import duties, supply chain disruption, reduced market access, operational uncertainty and additional economic pressure on industries already facing significant market challenges. PFP emphasised that many sectors rely heavily on cross border trade with the United Kingdom. Examples include starch products, sugar, flour, vegetable oils, oilseed meals and cocoa products, all of which move in substantial volumes between the two markets each year. **PFP warned that tariffs, regulatory divergence and customs barriers would threaten highly integrated commercial relationships developed over decades.** The organisation also called for clarification regarding eligibility criteria for the Brexit Adjustment Reserve, noting that targeted support measures may be necessary for sectors disproportionately affected by changes in trading arrangements. According to PFP, the United Kingdom represented a significant export outlet for several primary food processing sectors, accounting for up to 9% of production outlets in certain industries. Maintaining stable trading conditions therefore remained a key priority. PFP concluded that a comprehensive trade agreement combined with an appropriate adjustment period would be the most effective way to minimise disruption, protect competitiveness and preserve the resilience of Europe’s food supply chains. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials annually and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases --- ### [PFP position on the Taxonomy Regulation's draft delegated act on climate-related objectives and its annexes | 2020](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-position-on-the-taxonomy-regulations-draft-delegated-act-on-climate-related-objectives-and-its-annexes-2020/) **Published:** December 15, 2020 **Author:** admin **Content:** **15 December 2020** Primary Food Processors (PFP) expressed serious concerns regarding the European Commission’s first draft delegated act supplementing Regulation 2020/852 on sustainable finance and climate related objectives. According to the organisation, several provisions within the proposal risk undermining the competitiveness of Europe’s primary food processing industries and limiting their contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation. PFP specifically objected to provisions restricting the use of agricultural raw materials as feedstocks for industrial and energy applications, including plastics, biofuels, biowaste processing and organic chemicals. The organisation argued that these activities represent an essential component of Europe’s bioeconomy and contribute directly to decarbonisation objectives. **PFP warned that restricting the use of renewable agricultural raw materials in industrial and energy applications would undermine both competitiveness and climate objectives.** PFP represents industries processing sugar, starch, wheat flour, vegetable proteins, cocoa, vegetable oils and protein meals. Together, these sectors process approximately 220 million tonnes of agricultural raw materials annually, employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union and support around one million indirect jobs throughout associated value chains. The organisation highlighted the role of primary food processors in replacing fossil based carbon with renewable plant based alternatives. Through resource efficient production systems, the sector transforms agricultural raw materials into food ingredients, animal feed, detergents, cosmetics, bioplastics, fuels, paper products, paints, pharmaceuticals and other bio based materials while generating almost no food waste. **Primary food processors contribute to climate neutrality by replacing fossil based materials with renewable bio based alternatives throughout the European economy.** PFP argued that the draft delegated act creates inconsistencies with several existing European Union policies. According to the organisation, the proposed criteria do not align with broader objectives established under the European Green Deal, the Circular Economy Action Plan, the Farm to Fork Strategy, the Common Agricultural Policy and the Renewable Energy Directive. The association also raised concerns regarding regulatory governance and representation. It argued that the Technical Expert Group responsible for developing recommendations lacked sufficient expertise from the primary food processing sector and noted that PFP industries were not represented within the EU Platform on Sustainable Finance. According to PFP, delegated acts should not effectively redefine which economic activities qualify as sustainable. The organisation warned that sustainable finance rules have significant implications for investment decisions, access to capital and the future development of bioeconomy value chains. **PFP argued that the draft risks classifying important bioeconomy activities as unsustainable despite their contribution to climate neutrality and circular economy objectives.** The organisation also expressed concern that taxonomy classifications increasingly influence both regulatory and voluntary investment frameworks. Restrictive criteria could therefore discourage future investment in renewable materials, biorefineries and climate friendly industrial technologies. PFP called for the removal of provisions affecting the manufacture of organic base chemicals, plastics in primary form, transport biofuels and anaerobic digestion of biowaste. According to the association, these provisions unnecessarily restrict the use of renewable agricultural raw materials and risk weakening Europe’s bioeconomy. PFP concluded that primary food processors should be fully recognised as contributors to climate neutrality, sustainable industrial development and the transition towards a circular and bio based European economy. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of agricultural raw materials annually, employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union and support around one million indirect jobs throughout associated value chains. **Categories:** News **Tags:** Sustainability of the supply chain --- ### [PFP statement on new taxonomy draft delegated act | 2021](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-statement-on-new-taxonomy-draft-delegated-act-2021/) **Published:** March 23, 2021 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 23 March 2021** Primary Food Processors (PFP) welcomed the improvements made to the revised draft delegated act on climate related objectives under the EU Taxonomy framework while highlighting the need for further adjustments to fully recognise the contribution of primary food processors and bioeconomy value chains to Europe’s climate neutrality objectives. The organisation reacted to the revised draft delegated act scheduled for discussion by the Member States’ Expert Group on Sustainable Finance and stressed the importance of ensuring that sustainable finance rules remain aligned with broader European Green Deal objectives. **PFP emphasised that primary food processors and bioeconomy value chains must be fully recognised as part of Europe’s transition towards climate neutrality.** PFP represents industries that process agricultural raw materials such as cereals, sugar beet, oilseeds, cocoa beans and starch crops into food ingredients and a wide range of bio based products used throughout the European economy. According to the organisation, primary food processors contribute significantly to resource efficiency by valorising all components of agricultural raw materials and producing a broad range of renewable products for food, feed, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, industrial and bio based applications. The association highlighted that these industries play a key role in replacing fossil based materials with renewable alternatives and therefore contribute directly to decarbonisation, circular economy objectives and the development of a sustainable European bioeconomy. **Bio based products produced by primary food processors help replace fossil based materials and support the objectives of the European Green Deal.** While welcoming several improvements introduced in the revised draft, PFP expressed concerns regarding provisions that could limit the use of renewable agricultural raw materials in certain bio based applications. The organisation warned that restrictive wording could discourage future investment, reduce innovation and create uncertainty for bioeconomy value chains. PFP argued that excluding specific bioeconomy outlets from the positive taxonomy framework risks undermining policy coherence and could contradict broader EU climate and sustainability objectives. The organisation nevertheless welcomed the removal of certain restrictive terminology for industrial applications, broader alignment with Renewable Energy Directive sustainability criteria and greater recognition of greenhouse gas reduction objectives within the revised text. **PFP welcomed improvements to the draft delegated act but called for further changes to ensure policy coherence and support long term bioeconomy investment.** The association stressed that sustainable finance frameworks should encourage investment in innovation, renewable raw materials and industrial transformation rather than creating barriers for sectors that contribute directly to climate neutrality objectives. PFP concluded that primary food processors should remain fully integrated within Europe’s sustainable finance and climate transition framework and should be recognised as part of the solution to achieving the European Union’s environmental and climate goals. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of agricultural raw materials annually and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases --- ### [Joint Press release-Thirteen partners of Agri-Food Chain Roundtable on Plant Protection react to F2F targets on plant protection products in a joint letter | 2021](https://pfp-eu.org/joint-press-release-thirteen-partners-of-agri-food-chain-roundtable-on-plant-protection-react-to-f2f-targets-on-plant-protection-products-in-a-joint-letter-2021/) **Published:** May 31, 2021 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 31 May 2021** Primary Food Processors (PFP) joined twelve other organisations from across Europe’s agri food chain in calling for a comprehensive assessment of the Farm to Fork Strategy targets before any binding regulatory decisions are taken regarding pesticide reduction objectives. The joint statement was issued on the first anniversary of the Farm to Fork Strategy and focused on the proposed objective of reducing the use and risk of chemical plant protection products by 50% across the European Union. **The organisations called for scientific assessment, realistic implementation pathways and practical alternatives before adopting binding pesticide reduction targets.** According to the signatories, reducing plant protection products without ensuring the availability of viable alternatives could create significant economic, social and environmental consequences for European agriculture and food production. The organisations highlighted that European agriculture has already achieved substantial progress in reducing pesticide use and risk through innovation, improved farming practices and the development of more targeted crop protection technologies. They noted that modern active substances often require significantly lower application rates than older products and pointed to the increasing availability of low risk substances and alternative crop protection solutions. **European agriculture has already made significant progress in reducing pesticide use through innovation, improved practices and more targeted technologies.** The signatories acknowledged that further reductions may be achievable through future innovation, including biological crop protection solutions, improved crop rotation systems, digital and precision agriculture technologies, and New Genomic Techniques that support more resilient crop production. However, they stressed that many of these solutions are not yet sufficiently available or scalable across all agricultural sectors and production systems within the European Union. The organisations therefore warned against implementing rigid reduction targets without first conducting a comprehensive assessment of the cumulative economic, social and environmental impacts on agriculture, food production and competitiveness. **The transition towards more sustainable agriculture must be supported by innovation, practical alternatives and realistic implementation timelines.** The joint statement called on the European Commission to carry out comprehensive impact assessments, maintain dialogue across the agri food value chain, support innovation driven transition pathways and ensure that future policy decisions remain connected to operational realities faced by farmers and food producers. PFP joined a broad coalition of agricultural, food, feed, processing and trade organisations in supporting this call for a balanced and evidence based approach to implementing Farm to Fork objectives. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases --- ### [Primary Food Processors signs EU Code of Conduct | 2021](https://pfp-eu.org/primary-food-processors-signs-eu-code-of-conduct-2021/) **Published:** December 21, 2021 **Author:** admin **Content:** **21 December 2021** Primary Food Processors (PFP) signed the EU Code of Conduct for Responsible Food Business and Marketing Practices, thereby endorsing the aspirational objectives set out in this document. This is a voluntary initiative that PFP decided to commit to in order to contribute to and support the transition towards a more sustainable food system. PFP strongly supports a holistic approach to improving the sustainability of the EU food system and welcomes the recognition of the central role that food systems play in the transition towards a more sustainable European economy. **By signing the EU Code of Conduct, PFP reaffirmed its commitment to supporting the transition towards a more sustainable and resilient food system.** Over the years, primary food processors have made substantial contributions to ensuring food availability, maintaining food safety standards, supporting rural development and strengthening farm incomes across Europe. The sector continues to play an important role in connecting agricultural production with consumers while contributing to economic growth and sustainability objectives. PFP serves as the representative organisation for the European primary food processing industry before European institutions and international organisations. The industry processes approximately 220 million tonnes of agricultural raw commodities every year, including cereals, sugar beet, rapeseeds, soybeans, sunflower seeds, crude vegetable oil, starch potatoes and cocoa beans. **Primary food processors form a vital link in the food chain, transforming agricultural raw materials into safe, high quality food ingredients used throughout Europe.** The sector employs more than 120,000 people across Europe and plays a critical role in delivering efficiently produced, safe and high quality primary food products to customers and consumers. PFP emphasises that the quality and safety of both agricultural raw materials and finished products remain fundamental priorities throughout the food processing chain. The organisation believes that sustainability, food security, product quality and economic competitiveness must advance together in order to ensure the long term resilience of Europe’s food system. **PFP remains committed to working with stakeholders across the food chain to support sustainability, food security and responsible food production throughout the European Union.** PFP brings together the European Committee of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL), and the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across Europe. **Categories:** News --- ### [Primary Food Processors (PFP) strongly welcome publication of the Commission Communication ‘REPowerEU’ | 2022](https://pfp-eu.org/primary-food-processors-pfp-strongly-welcome-publication-of-the-commission-communication-repowereu-2022/) **Published:** March 9, 2022 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 9 March 2022** Primary Food Processors (PFP) welcomed the publication of the European Commission’s REPowerEU Communication and highlighted the urgent need to support Europe’s energy intensive food processing industries during a period of significant geopolitical uncertainty and energy market disruption. The organisation emphasised that primary food processors play a strategic role within the European food system by transforming agricultural raw materials into essential food ingredients used throughout the food supply chain. **PFP strongly welcomed the REPowerEU Communication and underlined the strategic importance of Europe’s primary food processing industries.** According to PFP, primary food processors contribute directly to food security by processing cereals, sugar beet, oilseeds, cocoa products and starch potatoes into ingredients used across a wide range of food manufacturing sectors. Maintaining stable production is therefore essential for ensuring the continued availability of food products throughout the European Union. The organisation noted that primary food processing is highly energy intensive and therefore particularly exposed to disruptions in energy supply and extreme fluctuations in energy prices. Reliable access to affordable energy remains critical for maintaining industrial operations and safeguarding food production capacity. **Primary food processing depends on stable and affordable energy supplies to ensure the continuity of Europe’s food chain.** PFP warned that prolonged energy shortages or sustained increases in energy costs could reduce production capacity, disrupt food ingredient availability and create broader challenges for food security across the European Union. Against this backdrop, the organisation called on European institutions and Member States to ensure that primary food processors are included among the sectors eligible for emergency support measures introduced under the Temporary Crisis Framework and related state aid mechanisms. PFP specifically requested targeted support measures designed to protect industrial food processing activities, maintain operational continuity and safeguard food ingredient production during periods of market disruption. **PFP called for primary food processors to receive priority access to emergency support measures aimed at protecting food security and industrial stability.** The organisation stressed that Europe’s food security objectives cannot be separated from the resilience and competitiveness of the industries responsible for transforming agricultural raw materials into food ingredients. PFP concluded that the successful implementation of REPowerEU should include measures that support industrial resilience, strengthen energy security and ensure the continued functioning of Europe’s food supply chains during periods of economic and geopolitical uncertainty. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases --- ### [PFP Statement on Prioritisation in the Event of Gas Rationining | 2022](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-statement-on-prioritisation-in-the-event-of-gas-rationining-2022/) **Published:** April 29, 2022 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 29 April 2022** Primary Food Processors (PFP) called on European institutions and Member States to recognise primary food processing industries as priority sectors in the event of gas rationing measures across the European Union. The statement was issued against the backdrop of growing concerns over European gas supplies following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, EU sanctions and the interruption of gas deliveries to several Member States. PFP warned that emergency gas rationing could have serious consequences for food security, supply chain continuity and the affordability of food and feed products throughout Europe. **PFP warned that emergency gas rationing measures could significantly disrupt the availability and affordability of food and feed across the European Union.** The organisation noted that the war in Ukraine had already created substantial pressure on the supply of key agricultural commodities, including wheat, sunflower oil and maize. Additional disruptions to energy supplies would further strain production systems and increase costs across food and feed value chains. According to PFP, gas shortages could interrupt the production of essential food ingredients, reduce the availability of feed materials, increase food inflation and threaten the continuity of industrial food production processes. The association stressed that primary food processing relies heavily on continuous industrial operations. Many facilities cannot simply stop and restart production without significant technical, safety and economic consequences. Unplanned interruptions would reduce output, increase costs and create cascading effects throughout food and feed supply chains. **Many primary food processing facilities operate continuous production systems that are incompatible with sudden stop and restart interruptions.** PFP therefore called for primary food processing industries to receive treatment comparable to the priority status granted to essential sectors during the COVID 19 crisis. The organisation argued that safeguarding food production capacity should remain a central objective of any emergency gas allocation framework. The association highlighted the strategic importance of key ingredients produced by primary food processors, including flour, vegetable oils, starch products, sugar, cocoa products and plant based proteins. Disruptions affecting these ingredients would have widespread consequences for downstream food manufacturing and consumer food availability. PFP also warned that interruptions to co products used in animal feed production could significantly affect livestock farming and reduce the availability of animal products throughout the European market. **Disruptions to primary food processing would affect both human food production and animal feed supply chains across Europe.** According to the organisation, priority sector recognition would help avoid severe disruptions to food supply chains, preserve food security and maintain economic stability during periods of energy shortage. PFP concluded that primary food processors should be formally recognised as priority sectors within any future EU gas rationing mechanism in order to safeguard food production, supply chain resilience and the functioning of Europe’s agri food system. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** News **Tags:** Sustainability of the supply chain --- ### [Joint Press Statement: Secure gas supply critical to maintain EU food supplies | 2022](https://pfp-eu.org/joint-press-statement-secure-gas-supply-critical-to-maintain-eu-food-supplies-2022/) **Published:** July 20, 2022 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 20 July 2022** Copa Cogeca, Primary Food Processors (PFP) and FoodDrinkEurope welcomed the European Commission’s “Save Gas for a Safe Winter” communication and called on Member States to recognise the agri food chain as a critical sector during any future gas rationing measures. The organisations stressed that secure and uninterrupted gas supplies are essential for maintaining food and feed production, protecting food security and ensuring the continued operation of Europe’s agri food supply chains during the ongoing energy crisis. **The European Commission recognised the strategic importance of the food supply chain and the need to secure gas supplies to safeguard food security.** The organisations welcomed the Commission’s recommendation that Member States classify the agri food chain as a critical sector within national emergency planning frameworks. According to the statement, this recognition reflects the sector’s central role in maintaining the availability of food, feed and agricultural products throughout Europe. Food and feed manufacturing systems rely heavily on stable gas supplies. Interruptions could significantly reduce production capacity, disrupt processing operations, affect agricultural commodity markets and create additional pressure on food affordability for consumers. **Any disruption to gas supplies would affect agricultural commodities and reduce the ability of food and feed manufacturers to operate at full capacity.** The organisations highlighted that Europe’s agri food industries were already facing substantial economic pressures, including rising electricity prices, natural gas cost inflation, fertiliser price increases, higher transport costs and growing labour expenses. Additional gas supply restrictions would further increase these challenges. Pekka Pesonen of Copa Cogeca warned that rising input costs were already having severe consequences for farmers and agricultural operators. PFP President Huub Scheres noted that many primary food processing facilities depend heavily on natural gas and that rationing measures could force production sites to reduce or suspend operations. FoodDrinkEurope Director General Dirk Jacobs also stressed that food manufacturing processes cannot operate efficiently under repeated stop and go production interruptions. **PFP warned that gas rationing could force primary food processing facilities to halt operations, threatening food production continuity.** The organisations called on Member States to prioritise the agri food sector when allocating gas supplies during emergency situations. They recommended that food and feed production facilities receive priority treatment immediately after households and hospitals to ensure continuity of essential food production activities. According to the statement, protecting gas supplies for the agri food sector is necessary not only to maintain industrial operations but also to safeguard food availability, food affordability and the resilience of Europe’s agricultural supply chains. **The organisations urged Member States to prioritise the agri food sector in emergency gas allocation plans immediately after households and hospitals.** Copa Cogeca, PFP and FoodDrinkEurope reaffirmed their commitment to maintaining reliable food supplies across Europe and pledged continued cooperation with European institutions throughout the energy crisis. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases --- ### [Joint Press Statement: Agri-food supply chain “societally-critical” - securing gas supply vital to maintain EU food supplies | 2022](https://pfp-eu.org/joint-press-statement-agri-food-supply-chain-societally-critical-securing-gas-supply-vital-to-maintain-eu-food-supplies-2022/) **Published:** July 28, 2022 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 28 July 2022** Copa Cogeca, Primary Food Processors (PFP) and FoodDrinkEurope welcomed the European Union’s decision to recognise the agri food supply chain as a societally critical sector within the framework of the “Save Gas for a Safe Winter” initiative adopted in response to Europe’s energy crisis. The initiative, endorsed by Member States on 26 July 2022, introduced a voluntary commitment to reduce gas demand by 15% during the winter period while ensuring that critical sectors and protected consumers continue to receive priority access to energy supplies. **The agri food supply chain was formally recognised as essential to the functioning of society and the preservation of European food security.** The organisations stressed that uninterrupted access to gas is fundamental for maintaining food production, feed manufacturing, agricultural processing and food distribution activities throughout the European Union. According to the joint statement, gas supply disruptions would have serious consequences for food and feed production systems, affecting the availability of agricultural commodities, food ingredients, animal feed and consumer products. Such disruptions could also increase food prices and place additional pressure on already strained supply chains. **Any significant interruption to gas supplies could reduce production capacity and threaten the continuity of Europe’s food and feed supply chains.** The organisations warned that food production facilities, feed manufacturers, farms and packaging operations all depend on stable energy supplies to operate effectively. Interruptions could result in reduced manufacturing output, production delays, supply shortages and operational shutdowns across multiple sectors. Following the adoption of the EU level agreement, Copa Cogeca, PFP and FoodDrinkEurope called on Member States to reflect this recognition within their national emergency frameworks and gas rationing plans. The organisations specifically requested that food production facilities, feed manufacturers, agricultural processors and packaging operators be protected from energy disconnections and continue receiving priority treatment during any future supply restrictions. **Member States were urged to formally recognise the agri food chain as a critical sector within national emergency and gas rationing frameworks.** At the same time, the organisations reaffirmed their commitment to improving energy efficiency, reducing energy consumption where feasible and supporting Europe’s longer term sustainability and energy transition objectives. They emphasised that efforts to improve energy efficiency should complement, rather than compromise, the ability of the agri food sector to maintain stable food production and food security throughout periods of crisis. **The agri food sector remains committed to energy efficiency improvements while ensuring the uninterrupted production of food and feed products.** PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases --- ### [Joint Press Release: Alarm bells ringing for EU agri-food sector as energy crisis bites | 2022](https://pfp-eu.org/joint-press-release-alarm-bells-ringing-for-eu-agri-food-sector-as-energy-crisis-bites-2022/) **Published:** September 8, 2022 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 8 September 2022** Copa Cogeca, Primary Food Processors (PFP) and FoodDrinkEurope jointly warned that rapidly rising energy prices and extreme weather events were creating unprecedented pressure on Europe’s agri food sector and threatening the continuity of food production across the European Union. Ahead of the Extraordinary Energy Council meeting and the European Commission President’s annual State of the Union address, the organisations highlighted the growing economic pressures affecting farmers, food manufacturers and primary food processors throughout the food supply chain. **The organisations warned that soaring energy prices were putting the continuity of Europe’s food production system at risk.** According to the joint statement, the sector is facing simultaneous pressures from inflation, supply chain disruption, geopolitical instability and climate related production challenges. Energy intensive food production facilities have been particularly affected by unprecedented increases in natural gas and electricity prices. The organisations also pointed to rising costs for fertilisers, transport fuels, packaging materials and labour, all of which were contributing to growing financial pressure across the food chain. These challenges intensified following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which significantly worsened energy market volatility, disrupted agricultural markets and increased uncertainty throughout global supply chains. **The war in Ukraine significantly amplified existing energy, agricultural and supply chain pressures across Europe.** The statement also highlighted the growing impact of climate change on agricultural production. Severe drought conditions affected large parts of Europe during 2022, reducing crop yields and increasing concerns regarding future food production capacity. Forecasts at the time indicated significant reductions in grain maize, soybean and sunflower production compared with historical averages. According to the organisations, the combined effects of rising costs and declining agricultural output were creating serious risks for industrial operations, food affordability and long term food security. The associations warned that some companies were increasingly facing difficult choices between reducing production, suspending operations, laying off staff or absorbing unsustainable financial losses. **Rising costs and supply disruptions created growing risks of production shutdowns, reduced output and financial instability across the agri food sector.** To address the crisis, the organisations called on the European Commission and Member States to take urgent action to reduce energy prices, improve market liquidity, strengthen energy security, diversify energy supplies and accelerate investment in sustainable energy generation. They also requested that the agri food sector be prioritised within national gas rationing plans and called for further improvements to the Temporary Crisis Framework to ensure that businesses could access support more effectively during the crisis. The organisations reaffirmed their commitment to working with European institutions to maintain a continuous supply of affordable, safe and high quality food products, just as the sector had done during the COVID 19 pandemic. **The agri food sector pledged continued cooperation with EU institutions to safeguard food security and maintain stable food supplies throughout the crisis.** PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases, News --- ### [PFP answers to the consultation of the European Commission on the proposal for a Sustainable Use of Pesticides | 2022](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-answers-to-the-consultation-of-the-european-commission-on-the-proposal-for-a-sustainable-use-of-pesticides-2022/) **Published:** September 12, 2022 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, September 2022** Primary Food Processors (PFP) submitted its position on the proposed Regulation on the Sustainable Use of Plant Protection Products (SUR), supporting efforts to reduce pesticide risks and promote safer alternatives while emphasising the need to maintain food security, agricultural productivity and the competitiveness of Europe’s agri food sector. The organisation supports the objective of reducing the use and risks associated with hazardous pesticides and increasing the adoption of lower risk and non chemical alternatives where practical and effective. **PFP supports reducing consumer exposure to pesticides while maintaining food security, food quality and a resilient European food supply chain.** PFP stresses that primary food processors depend on a stable supply of safe, sufficient, high quality and affordable agricultural raw materials. According to the organisation, pesticide reduction targets should therefore be accompanied by economically viable transition frameworks that reflect scientific, technological and economic realities. The association also highlights the importance of providing farmers and supply chain operators with sufficient time to adapt, develop alternative crop protection solutions and avoid unintended impacts on agricultural production. PFP identifies New Genomic Techniques (NGTs) as an important tool for reducing reliance on chemical plant protection products. The organisation notes that these technologies can make plant breeding faster, more precise and more effective, contributing to more sustainable agricultural systems and lower pesticide use. **PFP considers New Genomic Techniques an important innovation that can help reduce pesticide use while supporting sustainable agricultural production.** The organisation also raises concerns regarding elements of the proposed Integrated Pest Management framework. According to PFP, requiring all alternative methods to be tested before intervention and introducing additional procedural conditions could delay effective crop protection measures and reduce flexibility for farmers facing rapidly evolving challenges. PFP therefore recommends maintaining the current definition of Integrated Pest Management established under Article 6.3 of the Sustainable Use Directive. The association further argues that the proposed definition of sensitive areas lacks sufficient legal clarity. Combined with proposed buffer zone requirements, the measures could significantly reduce available agricultural land and create uncertainty regarding future production capacity. **PFP believes the impact of sensitive area definitions and buffer zones on EU agricultural production requires further assessment before implementation.** The organisation also highlights competitiveness concerns. PFP warns that stricter production requirements may place European producers at a disadvantage if equivalent standards are not applied to imported products. It therefore supports greater reciprocity in international trade, the use of mirror clauses where appropriate and fair implementation of Maximum Residue Limits. PFP emphasises that farmers must be supported throughout the transition through access to effective crop protection tools, innovation, modern technologies, predictable implementation frameworks and appropriate economic incentives. Overall, PFP supports proportionate and achievable pesticide reduction measures provided they do not reduce agricultural production, undermine food security or increase Europe’s dependence on imported agricultural raw materials. **PFP supports sustainable crop protection policies that balance environmental objectives with food security, competitiveness and long term agricultural resilience.** PFP brings together the European Committee of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association, the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL), and the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Position Papers **Tags:** Sustainability of the supply chain --- ### [PFP Statement on European Parliament Vote on the Revision of RED | 2022](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-statement-on-european-parliament-vote-on-the-revision-of-red-2022/) **Published:** September 20, 2022 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 20 September 2022** Primary Food Processors (PFP) took note of the European Parliament’s position on the revision of the Renewable Energy Directive (RED), adopted on 14 September 2022, and reiterated the importance of facilitating the use of biomass residues and wastes as part of the sector’s decarbonisation strategy. The organisation emphasises that primary food processors require practical and flexible pathways to reduce emissions, particularly in rural areas where direct electrification is not always technically or economically feasible. **PFP stresses that primary food processors must be able to use residues and wastes to generate green energy and support industrial decarbonisation.** PFP expressed disappointment that Members of the European Parliament rejected a proposal that would have facilitated the use of biomass residues in stationary industrial installations. The organisation believes such measures would have provided additional opportunities for food processors to reduce emissions while improving energy resilience. At the same time, PFP welcomed several aspects of the Parliament’s position. In particular, the organisation supported the rejection of the European Commission proposal to assign field emissions to certain non Annex IX residues and wastes. According to PFP, this outcome represents an improvement compared with earlier positions advanced by both the Commission and Member States. **PFP welcomed the rejection of proposals that would assign field emissions to certain residues and wastes used for renewable energy production.** The organisation also supported the decision to make greenhouse gas emission reduction requirements for biomass installations non retroactive, helping to preserve legal certainty and protect existing investments made by industrial operators. Despite these positive elements, PFP continues to have concerns regarding the practical implementation of the cascading use principle and the increase in greenhouse gas emission reduction thresholds for new biomass installations. The organisation believes that further clarification will be necessary to ensure that future rules remain workable for industrial users of biomass residues. According to PFP, the use of residues and wastes is particularly important for processing facilities located in rural or isolated regions where access to high voltage electricity infrastructure may be limited. In these situations, residue based energy can provide an important pathway for reducing emissions while maintaining production capacity. **Many rural food processing facilities require alternative decarbonisation pathways because direct electrification may not be immediately achievable.** PFP warns against adopting a rigid one size fits all approach to industrial decarbonisation and calls for policies that recognise the diversity of industrial operations, geographical conditions and energy infrastructure across Europe. The organisation argues that maintaining viable energy options for primary food processors is essential for food security, industrial competitiveness and European food sovereignty. Future renewable energy policies should therefore support practical and realistic pathways towards lower carbon production. **PFP considers residue based energy an important component of Europe’s food sovereignty, industrial resilience and decarbonisation strategy.** PFP brings together the European Committee of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL), and the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases, News --- ### [Joint Press Statement: EU must recognise agri-food producers as a priority in new emergency intervention | 2022](https://pfp-eu.org/joint-press-statement-eu-must-recognise-agri-food-producers-as-a-priority-in-new-emergency-intervention-2022/) **Published:** September 29, 2022 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 29 September 2022** Copa Cogeca, Primary Food Processors (PFP) and FoodDrinkEurope jointly called on EU Member States to recognise the agri food supply chain as a strategic priority during emergency energy interventions designed to address Europe’s escalating energy crisis. Ahead of the meeting of EU Energy Ministers, the organisations warned that unprecedented increases in energy prices were creating severe challenges across the entire agri food value chain, threatening food production, food affordability and long term economic sustainability. **The organisations called on EU Member States to guarantee affordable energy access and formally recognise the agri food chain as a strategic priority sector.** According to the joint statement, rising energy prices were affecting every stage of the food supply chain. Energy intensive operations faced substantial cost increases, food security risks were growing as supply chains came under pressure, and consumers were increasingly exposed to higher food prices. Continuous industrial food production systems also faced significant operational constraints due to rising energy costs. The organisations highlighted that the agri food sector had already implemented numerous measures to improve resilience and reduce energy consumption. At farm level, operators had introduced more efficient cooling systems, shorter refrigeration cycles and operational adjustments designed to reduce waste and improve efficiency. Industrial operators had invested in alternative energy sources, adjusted production schedules and implemented energy efficiency measures to reduce peak demand. **Many food production facilities operate continuously and cannot significantly reduce peak energy consumption without disrupting food production.** Copa Cogeca, PFP and FoodDrinkEurope jointly called for several urgent policy actions. These included measures to reduce energy prices, exemptions from mandatory peak hour energy consumption reductions, prioritisation of the agri food sector within national gas rationing plans and revisions to the Temporary State Aid Crisis Framework to better support food chain operators. The organisations also proposed reforms to state aid rules, including extending support measures through 2023, increasing maximum support levels, broadening eligibility criteria and recognising the specific challenges faced by energy intensive agri food industries. According to the statement, many operators were already facing significant liquidity pressures while attempting to prepare investment and operational plans for the following year. **The organisations warned that many agri food businesses faced severe financial pressure while continuing to ensure food production and supply chain stability.** Despite the immediate challenges, the sector reaffirmed its commitment to long term industrial resilience and decarbonisation. Investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency technologies, combined heat and power systems and lower carbon industrial processes remain important priorities for the future of European food production. The joint statement concluded that emergency support measures and long term energy transition policies must work together to safeguard Europe’s food security, industrial competitiveness and sustainability objectives. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases, News --- ### [Press Release: Primary Food Processors holds its 2022 Forum | 2022](https://pfp-eu.org/press-release-primary-food-processors-holds-its-2022-forum-2022/) **Published:** November 8, 2022 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 8 November 2022** Primary Food Processors (PFP) held its 2022 Forum in Brussels under the theme *“Rising to the Challenges of Climate Change and Energy Supplies”*, bringing together policymakers, industry representatives and energy experts to discuss the growing pressures facing Europe’s food processing industries. The discussions focused on the impact of climate change, energy supply instability, industrial decarbonisation and the long term resilience of Europe’s food and agricultural value chains. **PFP warned that Europe’s primary food processing industries are facing unprecedented pressure from rising energy costs, climate uncertainty and decarbonisation requirements.** Participants highlighted how rapidly increasing energy prices, driven by post pandemic market conditions and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, have created major challenges for industrial operators across Europe. At the same time, food processors are expected to continue investing in decarbonisation while maintaining production and ensuring food security. The forum also addressed the growing impact of climate change on agricultural production and the challenges farmers face in meeting sustainability objectives while maintaining productivity and competitiveness. PFP stressed that the ongoing energy crisis required urgent action to protect industrial activity and food production across the European Union. The organisation called for affordable energy access, financial support measures, secure energy supplies and policies that safeguard food processing capacity during periods of market disruption. **PFP called for urgent action to ensure that energy remains both available and affordable for Europe’s food processing industries.** Looking beyond short term measures, the organisation emphasised the need for supportive regulatory frameworks, increased investment in industrial decarbonisation and greater support for renewable energy solutions that reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels. PFP also highlighted the important role of biomass residues in supporting industrial decarbonisation. According to the organisation, primary food processing facilities should be allowed to generate energy from biomass residues as part of a broader transition towards lower carbon industrial operations. The forum concluded that supportive regulation, public investment and long term policy certainty will be critical to achieving climate objectives while maintaining Europe’s food security and industrial competitiveness. **Biomass energy, industrial decarbonisation and affordable energy access were identified as key priorities for the future resilience of Europe’s food processing sector.** PFP President Huub Scheres warned that, if not properly managed, the energy crisis could significantly delay the sector’s decarbonisation efforts and increase pressure on food production systems. He emphasised the need for stronger public support and a policy framework that enables continued investment in sustainable industrial transformation. The forum featured contributions from representatives of the European Commission, COPA COGECA, COGEN Europe, the energy policy community and the primary food processing industry. PFP brings together the European Committee of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL), and the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases, News --- ### [Press Release: Statement on EU Council’s general approach to the revision of the Industrial Emissions Directive | 2023](https://pfp-eu.org/press-release-statement-on-eu-councils-general-approach-to-the-revision-of-the-industrial-emissions-directive-2023/) **Published:** March 20, 2023 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 20 March 2023 • Ref. 23PFP006** The Primary Food Processors (PFP) association welcomes the general approach adopted by the Council regarding the revision of the Industrial Emissions Directive (2010/75/EU), reached during the Environmental Council meeting on 16 March 2023. PFP considers the compromise agreement relatively balanced and particularly welcomes the Council’s decision not to support the European Commission proposal requiring the strictest possible Emission Limit Values across all installations. According to the organisation, such an approach would be impractical due to the diversity of industrial processes, operational conditions and circumstances across Member States. **PFP considers the Council compromise relatively balanced and welcomes the rejection of the Commission proposal to impose the strictest possible Emission Limit Values.** The organisation nevertheless highlights two areas where concerns remain. These relate to the treatment of confidential business information under Article 13 and the proposed implementation of Environmental Performance Limit Values under Article 15. PFP notes that confidential and commercially sensitive information often plays an important role in defining Best Available Techniques (BAT) and establishing BAT Associated Emission Levels. The organisation believes that such information should only be disclosed to the European Commission and competent national authorities that are legally bound by professional secrecy obligations. According to PFP, commercially sensitive information should undergo aggregation and anonymisation procedures before being shared with third parties in order to minimise commercial risks and protect confidential business interests. **PFP believes sensitive industrial data should only be shared with third parties after aggregation and anonymisation procedures reduce commercial sensitivity.** The association regrets that the Council did not reject the Commission proposal that would grant external actors broader access to information than industry representatives participating in Technical Working Groups involved in the Sevilla process. PFP also expresses concerns regarding Environmental Performance Limit Values related to resource efficiency, water consumption, energy consumption and waste generation. The organisation argues that these indicators should not become legally binding obligations at EU level. According to PFP, the European Union already has several regulatory frameworks addressing these environmental areas, creating a risk of overlap, duplication and inconsistent implementation requirements. The organisation therefore believes that decisions regarding Environmental Performance Limit Values should remain under the discretion of Member States and industrial operators. **PFP warns that binding Environmental Performance Limit Values could create inconsistencies with existing EU environmental legislation and reduce operational flexibility.** To preserve the competitiveness of Europe’s primary food processing industries, PFP calls for concrete improvements to Articles 13 and 15 during the next stages of the legislative process. The organisation advocates stronger protection of confidential business information, greater safeguards for commercially sensitive data, and a more flexible approach to environmental performance indicators. PFP remains committed to supporting environmental objectives while ensuring that industrial competitiveness, operational flexibility and regulatory coherence are maintained throughout the implementation of future environmental legislation. PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials, including cereals, sugar beet, rapeseeds, soybeans, sunflower seeds, crude vegetable oils, cocoa products and starch potatoes, and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases, News --- ### [Press Release: Statement on EU Council’s general approach to the revision of the Industrial Emissions Directive](https://pfp-eu.org/press-release-statement-on-eu-councils-general-approach-to-the-revision-of-the-industrial-emissions-directive-3/) **Published:** March 20, 2023 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 20 March 2023** The Primary Food Processors (PFP) association welcomes the general approach adopted by the Council regarding the revision of the Industrial Emissions Directive (2010/75/EU), reached during the Environmental Council meeting on 16 March 2023. PFP considers the compromise agreement relatively balanced. In particular, the organisation welcomes the Council’s decision not to support the European Commission’s proposal requiring the strictest possible Emission Limit Values, recognising that industrial processes and operational conditions vary significantly across sectors and Member States. **PFP considers the Council’s general approach to be broadly balanced and welcomes the rejection of a one size fits all approach to emission limit values.** At the same time, PFP highlights two important areas where concerns remain. These relate to Article 13 on the handling of confidential business information within the Sevilla process and Article 15 on the implementation of environmental performance limit values. According to the organisation, confidential and commercially sensitive information often plays an important role in defining Best Available Techniques (BAT) and establishing BAT Associated Emission Levels (AELs). PFP believes that such information should only be shared with the European Commission and national competent authorities that are legally bound by professional confidentiality obligations. The association further argues that any information shared with external parties should first be aggregated and anonymised in order to reduce commercial sensitivity and protect confidential business data. **PFP believes commercially sensitive information should be protected through aggregation and anonymisation before being shared beyond competent authorities.** PFP regrets that the Council did not reject provisions that would grant external actors broader access to information than industry representatives participating in Technical Working Groups involved in the Sevilla process. The organisation also expresses concerns regarding environmental performance limit values linked to resource efficiency, water consumption, energy consumption and waste generation. PFP believes these indicators should not become legally binding requirements. According to the association, the European Union already has multiple legislative instruments addressing these environmental areas, creating a risk of overlapping obligations and regulatory inconsistencies. PFP therefore considers that decisions regarding such limits should remain under the discretion of Member States and operators. **PFP opposes binding environmental performance limit values for resource efficiency, water, energy and waste indicators and supports a more flexible implementation approach.** To preserve the competitiveness of Europe’s primary food processing industries, PFP calls for further improvements to Articles 13 and 15 during the next stages of the legislative process. The organisation remains committed to constructive engagement with European institutions and supports an Industrial Emissions Directive that achieves environmental objectives while maintaining industrial competitiveness and regulatory certainty. PFP brings together the European Committee of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers), the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), and the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials, including cereals, sugar beet, rapeseeds, soybeans, sunflower seeds, crude vegetable oil, cocoa products and starch potatoes, employing more than 120,000 people across the European Union. Official website: [www.pfp-eu.org](https://www.pfp-eu.org) **Categories:** Position Papers, News --- ### [PFP Statement: PFP acknowledge final adoption of the future ETS and flag remaining concerns | 2023](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-statement-pfp-acknowledge-final-adoption-of-the-future-ets-and-flag-remaining-concerns-2023/) **Published:** April 28, 2023 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 28 April 2023 • Ref. 23PFP012** Primary Food Processors (PFP) acknowledge the formal adoption of the revised Emissions Trading System (ETS) Directive by EU Member States and reaffirm their commitment to supporting industrial decarbonisation across Europe’s food processing sector. At the same time, the organisation warns that the revised framework introduces significant competitiveness and implementation challenges for primary food processing industries, which already face increasing energy costs, regulatory pressures and substantial investment needs. **PFP recognises the importance of climate action but warns that the revised ETS framework will require substantial investments to maintain both decarbonisation progress and industrial competitiveness.** The revised ETS significantly increases climate ambition by raising the emissions reduction target from 43% to 62% by 2030 compared with 2005 levels. According to PFP, achieving these objectives will require extensive industrial transformation, accelerated deployment of low carbon technologies and significant capital investment across energy intensive industries. PFP stresses that public financial support will play a critical role in enabling the sector to meet future climate obligations. The organisation notes that existing instruments such as the Innovation Fund and the Modernisation Fund may not be sufficient to address the scale of investment required for industrial decarbonisation. **PFP calls for additional European and national funding mechanisms to support industrial decarbonisation while preserving competitiveness.** The organisation argues that successful implementation of the revised ETS will require stronger financial support for both innovative and commercially available technologies, together with policy measures that help industries remain competitive throughout the transition. PFP also expresses concerns regarding the treatment of biomass based installations under the revised framework. Under the adopted rules, installations where biomass combustion emissions exceed 95% of total greenhouse gas emissions will be excluded from the future ETS system. According to PFP, this approach may create unintended consequences by reducing incentives for companies seeking to complete the transition towards fully renewable energy systems. The organisation believes that climate policies should continue encouraging investment in renewable energy rather than creating uncertainty around future regulatory treatment. **PFP believes that excluding high biomass installations from the future ETS could discourage the final transition towards fully renewable energy systems.** PFP maintains that primary food processors remain fully committed to decarbonisation and to supporting Europe’s climate objectives. However, the organisation emphasises that industrial competitiveness, affordable energy, adequate funding and coherent renewable energy incentives must remain central considerations throughout the implementation of future climate policies. The association calls for additional EU and national support mechanisms, sufficient financial resources for industrial transformation and policy frameworks that allow food processing industries to remain globally competitive while delivering long term emissions reductions. PFP brings together the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe), the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL), the European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), and the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases, News --- ### [PFP Statement: New Genomic Techniques proposal a first step towards workable EU regulatory framework | 2023](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-statement-new-genomic-techniques-proposal-a-first-step-towards-workable-eu-regulatory-framework-2023/) **Published:** July 7, 2023 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 7 July 2023** Primary Food Processors (PFP) welcome the European Commission’s proposal for a new Regulation on plants produced through New Genomic Techniques (NGTs), describing it as an important first step towards a workable, science based and internationally coherent regulatory framework for the European Union. The proposal, published on 5 July 2023, recognises the potential contribution of New Genomic Techniques to addressing some of the most significant agricultural and competitiveness challenges facing Europe. PFP supports the Commission’s acknowledgement that modern plant breeding technologies can play an important role in strengthening agricultural resilience and sustainability. **PFP welcomes the Commission’s recognition that an appropriate legal framework for New Genomic Techniques can help address major agricultural and competitiveness challenges facing Europe.** The organisation notes that Europe’s food and ingredient supply chains are increasingly affected by climate change, plant diseases, abiotic stress conditions and pressure on agricultural productivity. According to PFP, New Genomic Techniques can contribute to improving crop resilience, supporting higher yields and strengthening long term food security. PFP believes that more resilient and productive crop varieties can improve farmer incomes, enhance supply chain stability and support the competitiveness of Europe’s primary food processing industries. **New Genomic Techniques have the potential to improve crop resilience, support food security and strengthen the competitiveness of European agriculture and food production.** The organisation strongly supports the Commission’s proposal to exempt Category 1 NGT plants, considered conventional like products, from the standard European GMO legal framework. PFP considers this approach proportionate and science based, while also supporting continued transparency throughout the supply chain. According to PFP, Category 1 plants should be treated as conventional like products because they could arise through conventional breeding methods or occur naturally. The organisation therefore supports their exemption from existing GMO legislation while maintaining appropriate transparency mechanisms. **PFP supports exempting conventional like Category 1 NGT plants from GMO legislation while maintaining transparency throughout the supply chain.** PFP also highlights the competitive challenges facing European agriculture compared with countries that have already authorised and adopted New Genomic Techniques. The organisation warns that regulatory delays could place European farmers, processors and food businesses at a disadvantage compared with international competitors. The association hopes that the proposed framework will help address this imbalance by creating a clear, predictable and innovation friendly regulatory environment that encourages investment and technological progress across the agricultural value chain. PFP remains committed to constructive engagement with European institutions and stakeholders throughout the legislative process. The organisation will continue supporting the development of a practical and coherent framework that promotes innovation, sustainability and competitiveness while maintaining high standards of food safety and consumer confidence. PFP brings together the European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL), and the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases, News --- ### [PFP statement on plenary EP vote on the revision of the Industrial Emissions Directive | 2023](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-statement-on-plenary-ep-vote-on-the-revision-of-the-industrial-emissions-directive-2023/) **Published:** July 12, 2023 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 12 July 2023 • Ref. 23PFP** Primary Food Processors (PFP) welcome the outcome of the European Parliament plenary vote on the revision of the Industrial Emissions Directive (2010/75/EU), adopted on 11 July 2023, and consider the result to represent a balanced approach between environmental ambition and industrial competitiveness. PFP supports the objectives of the European Green Deal and recognises the importance of advancing sustainability across industrial sectors. At the same time, the organisation emphasises that maintaining the competitiveness of Europe’s primary food processing industry remains essential for food security, economic resilience and the long term sustainability of the agri food value chain. **PFP considers the European Parliament’s position on the revision of the Industrial Emissions Directive to be balanced overall and supportive of both environmental objectives and industrial competitiveness.** The organisation welcomes several aspects of the Parliament’s position that it believes provide a constructive basis for the next phase of interinstitutional negotiations. In particular, PFP supports the approach to information sharing during the preparation of Best Available Techniques (BAT) reference documents under Article 13(2), which is intended to improve transparency and technical cooperation among stakeholders. PFP also welcomes the framework relating to the setting of emission limit values under Article 15(3), as well as the treatment of indicative environmental performance values under Article 15(3a). According to the organisation, these elements contribute to a more balanced and practical implementation framework for industrial operators. **PFP supports transparent information sharing, balanced emissions requirements and practical environmental performance measures within the revised Directive.** The association believes that the Parliament’s adopted position can serve as a constructive foundation for discussions between the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission during the upcoming legislative negotiations. PFP continues to advocate for policies that achieve environmental objectives while ensuring that European industries remain competitive in global markets. The organisation stresses that sustainability and competitiveness must be pursued together in order to safeguard investment, innovation and long term industrial resilience. **PFP believes future negotiations should continue to balance environmental ambition with the competitiveness needs of Europe’s primary food processing industries.** PFP brings together the European Committee of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association, the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), and the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Position Papers, News **Tags:** Sustainability of the supply chain --- ### [PFP Statement on the release of the EFSA opinion on Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons | 2023](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-statement-on-the-release-of-the-efsa-opinion-on-mineral-oil-hydrocarbons-2023/) **Published:** September 14, 2023 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Ref. 23PFP016 • Brussels, 14 September 2023** Primary Food Processors (PFP) take note of the conclusions of the updated European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) opinion on Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons (MOH) in food and reaffirm their commitment to addressing contamination risks throughout the agri food value chain. Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons contamination in food has been a significant issue for the sector for several years. According to EFSA’s updated scientific opinion, contamination may originate from a variety of sources throughout production, processing, packaging and distribution chains, highlighting the complexity of the challenge. **PFP supports science based risk assessment and remains committed to continued action and constructive engagement on Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons contamination.** EFSA identified several potential sources of contamination, including environmental exposure, airborne contamination, lubricants used in industrial machinery, release agents, processing aids, food and feed additives, and migration from food contact materials. The opinion also highlights the complexity of modern supply chains and the challenges associated with tracing contamination pathways. PFP members have already undertaken extensive efforts to better understand, monitor and reduce contamination risks. These activities include identifying contamination routes for products, evaluating analytical and detection challenges, investigating mitigation measures, monitoring supply chains and collaborating with stakeholders throughout the food system. **PFP members have implemented extensive monitoring, assessment and mitigation efforts to better understand and reduce MOH contamination risks.** The organisation supports evidence based scientific assessment and continues to contribute to the regulatory and technical discussions surrounding MOH contamination. This includes providing occurrence data, sharing technical expertise, participating in EFSA consultation processes and engaging constructively with stakeholders across the value chain. PFP believes that effective management of MOH contamination requires collaboration among industry, regulators, researchers and other stakeholders. Continued scientific research, robust analytical methods and practical mitigation measures will remain important components of future efforts. **Scientific evidence, stakeholder cooperation and practical risk mitigation measures remain essential to addressing MOH contamination across food supply chains.** PFP remains committed to continuing its efforts to address Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons contamination and to participating actively in future scientific, technical and regulatory discussions. PFP brings together the European Committee of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association, the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), and the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Position Papers, News **Tags:** Food regulatory issues --- ### [PFP Press Release following EP Plenary vote on NGTs Regulation | 2024](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-press-release-following-ep-plenary-vote-on-ngts-regulation-2024/) **Published:** February 9, 2024 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 09 February 2024** Primary Food Processors (PFP) welcome the European Parliament’s adoption of its position on the European Commission proposal for a Regulation on plants produced through New Genomic Techniques (NGTs), bringing the legislative process one step closer to completion. The organisation welcomes the European Parliament’s recognition that New Genomic Techniques can contribute to addressing major agricultural, environmental and food security challenges facing the European Union. PFP also supports the acknowledgement that a dedicated and modern legal framework is required to facilitate innovation while maintaining high standards of safety and transparency. **The European Parliament recognised the potential of New Genomic Techniques to help address major agricultural challenges facing the European Union.** PFP particularly welcomes the decision to maintain the two category system originally proposed by the European Commission. Under this approach, Category 1 NGT plants are recognised as equivalent to conventionally bred plants and are exempt from standard GMO legislation requirements, while Category 2 NGT plants remain subject to GMO related regulatory requirements. The organisation considers this distinction an important step towards creating a proportionate, science based and innovation friendly framework for plant breeding technologies in Europe. **PFP supports the recognition that Category 1 NGT plants are equivalent to conventionally bred plants and should be treated accordingly.** Despite supporting the overall direction of the legislation, PFP expresses concerns regarding the European Parliament’s position on mandatory labelling requirements for Category 1 NGT products. According to the organisation, mandatory labelling is difficult to reconcile with the principle that these products are considered equivalent to conventionally bred plants. PFP also notes that the adopted provisions differ from positions previously supported by both the ENVI and AGRI Committees during earlier stages of the legislative process. **PFP considers mandatory labelling requirements for Category 1 NGT products inconsistent with their classification as conventional like products.** The organisation stresses that an appropriate regulatory framework for New Genomic Techniques could contribute to improving crop resilience, supporting climate adaptation, reducing agricultural production challenges, encouraging innovation in plant breeding and strengthening the sustainability of Europe’s food systems. PFP expects the Council of the European Union to continue examining the Parliament’s position and to further refine the legislative text during future negotiations. The organisation remains committed to constructive engagement with policymakers and stakeholders throughout the legislative process. **PFP will continue supporting the development of a workable, science based and innovation friendly framework for New Genomic Techniques in the European Union.** PFP brings together the European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL), and the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Press Releases --- ### [PFP Statement on the outcome of the joint vote of the EP ENVI and IMCO Committees on their draft report on Substantiation of Green Claims | 2024](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-statement-on-the-outcome-of-the-joint-vote-of-the-ep-envi-and-imco-committees-on-their-draft-report-on-substantiation-of-green-claims-2024/) **Published:** February 14, 2024 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 14 February 2024** The Primary Food Processors of the EU (PFP) welcome the report on the Green Claims Directive approved by the European Parliament’s Committees on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) and on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO). PFP supports the European Commission’s proposal as an important framework for harmonising environmental claims and ensuring that sustainability statements made by businesses are properly substantiated. The organisation believes that a harmonised approach can help prevent misleading environmental claims while creating greater transparency and trust for consumers. According to the European Commission, the Green Claims Directive aims to address the proliferation of public and private environmental labels, unlock the potential of green markets and facilitate cross border trade throughout the European Union. **PFP supports a harmonised framework for environmental claims that improves transparency, prevents misleading claims and strengthens consumer confidence.** PFP sectors have been actively involved in sustainability initiatives and in the development of Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR). These methodologies help identify environmental hotspots throughout product life cycles and support continuous improvement efforts across food and agricultural value chains. The organisation agrees that environmental claims should be substantiated through robust Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodologies. However, PFP also highlights the importance of finding an appropriate balance between scientific robustness and practical implementation requirements for companies operating across complex supply chains. According to PFP, further research is still required to better understand the relationship between environmental claims and the actual reduction of environmental impacts. Ensuring that substantiation requirements remain credible, proportionate and workable will be essential for the long term success of the framework. **PFP supports science based substantiation of green claims while emphasising the need for practical, proportionate and workable implementation requirements.** The organisation remains committed to constructive engagement with European institutions throughout the legislative process and encourages the European Parliament and Council to finalise their positions and reach a balanced compromise agreement. PFP brings together the European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL), and the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe). **Categories:** News --- ### [Primary Food Processors welcome the adoption of the legislative text on the Industrial Emissions Directive by the Economic and Financial Affairs Council | 2024](https://pfp-eu.org/primary-food-processors-welcome-the-adoption-of-the-legislative-text-on-the-industrial-emissions-directive-by-the-economic-and-financial-affairs-council-2024/) **Published:** April 12, 2024 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 12 April 2024** Primary Food Processors (PFP) welcome the formal adoption of the revised Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) legislative text by the Economic and Financial Affairs Council while highlighting several important considerations regarding implementation and operational feasibility across the sector. The organisation welcomes the compromise text revising Directive 2010/75/EU and particularly supports the commitment to ensuring equal access to data for all stakeholders participating in future revisions of Best Available Techniques Reference Documents (BREFs). **PFP welcomes the commitment to equal stakeholder access to data during future revisions of Best Available Techniques Reference Documents (BREFs).** According to PFP, equal access to technical and operational information will contribute to greater transparency and more balanced participation throughout the development of future industrial emissions policies and technical standards. At the same time, the organisation expresses concerns regarding the obligation for competent authorities to apply the strictest achievable emission limit values based on Best Available Techniques (BAT). PFP notes that primary food processing installations operate under highly diverse production conditions and that a one size fits all approach may not reflect operational realities across the sector. PFP stresses that some installations could face significant challenges in achieving the most demanding emission levels and therefore emphasises the importance of considering the full BAT Associated Emission Level (BAT AEL) range during implementation. **PFP believes that implementation should recognise the operational diversity of primary food processing facilities and make full use of the BAT AEL range where appropriate.** The organisation also raises concerns regarding the introduction of binding Environmental Performance Limit Values (EPLVs) for water management. While environmental performance indicators relating to waste and other resources remain indicative, water related EPLVs will become binding requirements under the revised framework. PFP argues that this approach creates an imbalance between environmental performance indicators and may introduce additional implementation challenges for operators across the sector. **PFP regrets that water related Environmental Performance Limit Values will become binding while other resource performance indicators remain indicative.** The association calls for a balanced implementation of the revised Industrial Emissions Directive that supports both environmental objectives and industrial competitiveness. According to PFP, implementation should recognise operational diversity, allow realistic compliance pathways, encourage continuous dialogue between authorities and industry stakeholders, and ensure that environmental requirements remain technically achievable. PFP confirms its commitment to continued engagement with policymakers, regulators and stakeholders throughout the implementation phase of the revised Directive. **PFP supports implementation of the revised IED in a manner that achieves environmental objectives while safeguarding the competitiveness of Europe’s primary food processing industry.** PFP brings together the European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL), and the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe). **Categories:** Press Releases, News --- ### [Primary Food Processors Position on the Proposal for the Regulation for plants resulting from New Genomic Techniques (NGTs) | 2025](https://pfp-eu.org/primary-food-processors-position-on-the-proposal-for-the-regulation-for-plants-resulting-from-new-genomic-techniques-ngts-2025/) **Published:** January 25, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Ref. 25PFP002** PFP represents the European primary food processing industry, a vital link in the food chain that delivers safe, high quality food and feed products to consumers and downstream industries across Europe. The sector processes approximately 220 million tonnes of agricultural raw commodities each year and employs more than 120,000 people. PFP welcomed the European Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on plants obtained through certain New Genomic Techniques (NGTs) and their food and feed products, published in July 2023, and has actively contributed to discussions surrounding the future regulatory framework. The organisation particularly supports the distinction between plants derived through targeted mutagenesis and cisgenesis and traditional transgenic GMO plants. PFP considers the creation of Category 1 NGT plants an important step forward, recognising that these plants could arise through conventional breeding methods or occur naturally and should therefore be treated as conventional like products. **PFP supports the recognition of Category 1 NGT plants as conventional like products and welcomes a science based regulatory framework for their use within the European Union.** Transparency remains an important element of the proposal. PFP supports the inclusion of relevant information within public databases and registers, allowing stakeholders access to information while maintaining a proportionate regulatory approach. According to the organisation, products recognised as conventional like should follow the same legislative framework as conventionally bred plants and products. PFP therefore supports the European Commission’s proposal to exempt Category 1 NGT plants and products from mandatory GMO labelling and traceability requirements. The association argues that introducing mandatory labelling and traceability obligations would require unnecessary segregation of Category 1 NGT products throughout the supply chain. Such requirements would create additional costs, reduce adoption, limit innovation and undermine the contribution that these technologies could make to sustainability, resilience and food security. **Mandatory labelling and traceability requirements for conventional like Category 1 NGT products would create unnecessary barriers to innovation, sustainability and food system resilience.** The proposed verification procedure for Category 1 plants is also considered important. PFP emphasises that implementation should ensure a harmonised approach across all Member States in order to avoid fragmentation of the internal market. The organisation further stresses that the process should remain a simple verification procedure without unnecessary administrative burdens for operators. PFP also highlights the importance of regulatory coherence both within the European Union and internationally. Consistent and predictable rules are viewed as essential for maintaining competitiveness, supporting innovation and facilitating the adoption of new breeding technologies across agricultural and food value chains. The organisation remains committed to constructive engagement with European institutions and calls for the timely adoption of a clear, workable and science based legal framework for NGT plants and products derived from them. **PFP calls for a harmonised, practical and internationally coherent regulatory framework that enables innovation while maintaining consumer confidence and food security.** PFP brings together the European Committee of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers), the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), and the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL). PFP members process approximately 220 million tonnes of raw materials and employ more than 120,000 people across the European Union. **Categories:** Position Papers **Tags:** Food regulatory issues --- ### [PFP opposes the reopening of the Industrial Emissions Directive under the Omnibus regulation | 2025](https://pfp-eu.org/pfp-opposes-the-reopening-of-the-industrial-emissions-directive-under-the-omnibus-regulation-2025/) **Published:** January 28, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 28 January 2025** The Primary Food Processors (PFP) association welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to explore simplification of reporting obligations arising from EU environmental legislation. At the same time, the organisation believes that recently adopted legislation should be given sufficient time to be implemented before any further revisions are considered. **PFP does not support reopening the recently adopted Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) through future omnibus simplification initiatives.** PFP argues that the revised Industrial Emissions Directive, formally adopted through Directive 2024/1785 and published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 15 July 2024, should now enter a period of implementation and regulatory stability rather than being reopened shortly after adoption. According to the organisation, frequent legislative revisions create uncertainty for industrial operators and can undermine investment planning at a time when industries are already facing major decarbonisation and competitiveness challenges. PFP further emphasises that the revised Industrial Emissions Directive continues to play an important role in supporting environmental protection and public health through effective pollution prevention and control measures applied to large agro industrial installations across Europe. The organisation remains committed to contributing constructively to the implementation of the Directive, including participation in the development of Best Available Techniques (BAT) conclusions and the establishment of realistic and scientifically robust emissions benchmarks. **PFP supports a data driven approach to emissions regulation based on realistic operational data and scientifically grounded benchmarks.** PFP also highlights the importance of comprehensive data collection and evidence based policymaking to ensure that environmental requirements remain both effective and technically achievable for industrial operators. While opposing the reopening of the Directive itself, the association supports targeted efforts to simplify reporting obligations where unnecessary administrative burdens can be reduced without weakening environmental objectives. **PFP welcomes and intends to contribute actively to the ongoing DG Environment study examining opportunities to simplify reporting requirements linked to the Industrial Emissions Directive.** The organisation believes that future simplification efforts should focus on reducing unnecessary reporting burdens for businesses while preserving the environmental objectives and regulatory certainty established under the recently revised framework. PFP brings together the European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association, the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), and the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL). **Categories:** News **Tags:** Sustainability of the supply chain --- ### [Want to learn more about who Primary Food Processors are? Take a look at our new guide to Who We Are | 2024](https://pfp-eu.org/want-to-learn-more-about-who-primary-food-processors-are-take-a-look-at-our-new-guide-to-who-we-are-2024/) **Published:** March 25, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** **A vital link in the food and feed chain.** Primary Food Processors represent a key link in the food chain, transforming agricultural raw materials into safe and high quality food ingredients and feed materials. Acting as the bridge between farmers and downstream industries, the sector plays an essential role in ensuring the availability of food, feed and bio based products across Europe. Primary Food Processors handle more than 220 million tonnes of agricultural raw materials each year and are among the largest users of cereals, starch potatoes, sugar beet and oilseeds in the European Union. **Primary Food Processors link farmers to markets, transforming crops into essential ingredients used across the EU food system.** The sector transforms raw agricultural materials into consumable ingredients and produces essential food inputs such as flour, sugar, starch, vegetable oils and plant proteins. These products support food security, strengthen supply chains and contribute to innovation across both traditional and emerging food markets. Its outputs are used throughout the economy. Cereal flours supply bakeries and food manufacturers, sugars support food, industrial and energy applications, starches serve food and industrial sectors, vegetable oils are used in both food and bio based industries, plant proteins support alternative food products and animal feed, and cocoa remains a key ingredient in confectionery production. **Nearly 100% of raw materials are utilised, ensuring minimal waste and maximum resource efficiency.** Beyond food production, primary food processors contribute to a wide range of sectors. Co products are used in animal feed, while other outputs support the bioeconomy through biofuels and renewable materials. Additional applications can be found in packaging, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, demonstrating the sector’s broad economic contribution. Primary Food Processors are also actively investing in sustainability by reducing emissions, improving energy efficiency, supporting biodiversity and implementing strict European sustainability standards throughout their operations. The Primary Food Processors of the EU bring together the European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association, the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL), and the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe). **Categories:** News --- ### [Joint AgriFood Chain Position on the Proposal for the Regulation for plants resulting from New Genomic Techniques (NGTs) | 2025](https://pfp-eu.org/joint-agrifood-chain-position-on-the-proposal-for-the-regulation-for-plants-resulting-from-new-genomic-techniques-ngts-2025/) **Published:** April 28, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 28 April 2025** The undersigned agri food value chain partners are calling on EU policymakers to support the European Commission and Council proposal on plants produced through certain New Genomic Techniques (NGTs) and to reject any additional mandatory traceability and labelling requirements for conventional like Category 1 NGT plants and products. The organisations also encourage greater public understanding of NGTs, including both their potential benefits and risks, in order to support informed discussion and responsible innovation across the European food system. In its Vision for Agriculture and Food, the European Commission recognised that NGTs can contribute to food security and that an enabling regulatory framework is necessary to maintain a level playing field with third countries. The signatories support this objective and welcome efforts to establish a science based and proportionate legal framework for plants produced through certain NGTs. **A science based and proportionate legal framework for NGT plants is considered essential to strengthen the competitiveness and resilience of European agriculture, food and feed supply chains.** The organisations express strong concern regarding proposals for mandatory traceability and labelling of conventional like Category 1 NGT plants and products. According to the signatories, such requirements would negatively affect innovation, adoption, trade, and the competitiveness of the European agri food sector. Category 1 NGT plants are, by definition, comparable to plants that could result from conventional breeding and may be indistinguishable from conventional or naturally occurring variants using current analytical methods. This creates significant technical and enforcement challenges, particularly for imported food and feed products where reliable verification methods do not exist. Mandatory traceability and labelling would also require physical segregation throughout the supply chain, increasing storage, transport, processing, and administrative costs. Given the bulk nature of agricultural commodity markets, the organisations argue that such segregation would be impractical for many commodities and would reduce competitiveness. **A Wageningen University study suggests that mandatory traceability and labelling requirements could reduce the economic benefits of conventional like NGTs by up to 80 percent and make adoption economically unviable.** The signatories further argue that labelling products differently despite their equivalence could mislead consumers by implying differences in safety or quality where none exist. They note that Category 1 NGT plants have been assessed as safe and equivalent to conventionally bred plants. According to the organisations, transparency can already be achieved through the database proposed by the European Commission, which would provide information on Category 1 NGT status while allowing breeders, farmers, researchers, and supply chain operators to make informed decisions. Globally, more than 25 countries have introduced policies covering NGT plants, and none currently require traceability or labelling for conventional like NGT products. The signatories warn that introducing EU specific requirements could place European operators and international suppliers at a competitive disadvantage and redirect trade towards markets with more practical regulatory frameworks. **The undersigned organisations urge EU institutions to adopt a future proof, workable and proportionate regulation that supports innovation, competitiveness, sustainability and food security while maintaining a level playing field with third countries.** NameRole and OrganisationPeter MeedendorpEuropean Council of Young FarmersMarco PellegriniThe European Chemical Industry CouncilMarie-Christine RiberaEuropean Association of Sugar ManufacturersElisabeth LacosteInternational Confederation of European Beet GrowersIliana AxiotiadesEuropean Association of Cereals, Rice, Feedstuffs, Oil Seeds, Olive Oil, Oils and Fats and Agrosupply TradeVincent SaingierConfederation of European Yeast ProducersElli TsiforouCopa and CogecaOlivier de MatosCropLife EuropeCatherine EntzmingerEuropean Cocoa AssociationFrancesco VacondioEuropean Flour Milling AssociationNuria MorenoEuropean Vegetable Protein AssociationNathalie LecocqFEDIOLEmiel Van DijkPrimary Food ProcessorsNelli HajduStarch Europe **Categories:** Position Papers, News **Tags:** Food regulatory issues --- ### [Press Release: PFP FORUM 2025 | 2025](https://pfp-eu.org/press-release-pfp-forum-2025-2025/) **Published:** April 30, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Brussels, 30 April 2025** On 29 April 2025, Primary Food Processors (PFP) hosted a high level discussion on the theme *“From Field to Market: Unlocking the Competitive Edge of Primary Food Processing”*, highlighting both the crucial role of EU primary food processors and the competitiveness challenges and opportunities ahead. Primary Food Processors act as the link between agriculture and consumers, converting agricultural commodities into essential food ingredients, animal feed and bio based products that support the EU bioeconomy. As key actors in the EU’s food, feed and industrial value chains, they are vital for food security, sovereignty, innovation and rural economies. In a context of increasing global competition, price volatility and decarbonisation demands, the forum focused on how to ensure the continued competitiveness of the sector and strengthen its contribution to Europe’s economy and food system. **Primary Food Processors help safeguard food security and sustain rural economies by linking millions of farmers to markets.** Led by moderator Natasha Foote, the forum opened with remarks from the PFP Presidency and continued with the presentation of a competitiveness study conducted by Wageningen Economic & Social Research. The study examined the sector’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats while highlighting its strategic importance to the European economy. The research showed that primary food processors handle approximately 250 million tonnes of agricultural raw materials each year, support around 1.2 million jobs throughout the value chain, and provide more than 137,000 direct jobs across Europe. The study also highlighted that low profit margins make the sector particularly vulnerable to external shocks, while decarbonisation requirements and complex legislation continue to increase operational pressures. **Processing around 250 million tonnes of agricultural raw materials annually, the sector remains a cornerstone of Europe’s food and industrial value chains.** Policy perspectives were provided by representatives from the European Commission. DG AGRI’s Fabien Santini outlined upcoming simplification measures aimed at reducing regulatory burdens for farmers and the food industry. DG ENER’s Tom Howes discussed EU support for industrial decarbonisation through the Clean Industrial Deal while acknowledging the specific characteristics of primary food processing that should be reflected in future policy frameworks. The discussion also featured contributions from Patrick Pagani of COPA COGECA and Christophe Lescroart representing the PFP Board, followed by an interactive exchange with participants. > *“It is imperative that we work together to leverage our collective expertise and resources to drive progress and build a brighter future for all.”* > > Christophe Lescroart, on behalf of PFP --- Primary Food Processors (PFP) represents the primary food processing industry in the European Union and serves as the link between agriculture and downstream food, feed and industrial value chains. For more information, visit [www.pfp-eu.org](https://www.pfp-eu.org). PFP brings together the European Association of Sugar Manufacturers (CEFS), the European Cocoa Association (ECA), the European Flour Milling Association (European Flour Millers), the European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO), the European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry (FEDIOL), and the European Starch Industry Association (Starch Europe). **Categories:** Press Releases, News --- ### [Food security – why Primary Food Processors matter (Factsheet) | 2025](https://pfp-eu.org/food-security-why-primary-food-processors-matter-factsheet-2025/) **Published:** December 25, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** **Food security:** why Primary Food Processors matter Depending on the specific activity, between 45% and 90% of the ingredients processed by the industry end up in food, making it an essential contributor to food security in the EU. The remaining part of the output provides essential inputs to animal feed, energy, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries, as well as industrial uses. The primary food processing sector transforms a wide range of agricultural raw materials into ingredients and products used across food, feed, energy and industrial value chains. SectorRaw materialsEnd productsVegetable oils and mealsRapeseed, soya, sunflower seed, linseed, palm, coconutVegetable oils used in food, such as margarine and bottled oil, and non food uses such as biodiesel and biochemicals. Protein meal is used as feed.Vegetable proteinsWheat, soya, peas, potato, rice, legumesProtein flours, isolates and concentrates sold to secondary processors producing plant based protein goods, such as meat and dairy alternatives, and animal feed.Flour millingWheat, rye, oatsDifferent types of flours sold in bulk to secondary processors, bakeries and feed producers.StarchWheat, corn, potato, peas, rice, oatsStarches and derivatives, proteins and fibres used as key ingredients in food, feed and industrial applications.SugarSugar beets, mainly from France, Germany and PolandSugar for food and industrial use, animal feed, molasses, bioethanol and biomethane.CocoaCocoa beans, 100% imported, mainly from smallholders in West AfricaPaste, powder and butter, later made into chocolate and other confectionery products.In 2024, primary food processors handled more than 248 million tonnes of raw agricultural commodities, the vast majority of which were sourced within the European Union. IndustryRaw commodities processed in 2024Of which sourced from the EUVegetable oils50.6 million tonnes32.1 million tonnesVegetable proteins16.4 million tonnes16.4 million tonnesFlour mill products47 million tonnes42.3 million tonnesStarches22 million tonnes22 million tonnesSugar110.7 million tonnes110.7 million tonnesCocoa1.6 million tonnes0 million tonnes**Primary food processing total****248.3 million tonnes****223.5 million tonnes**The sector generated a production value of €78 billion in 2023, representing approximately 7% of the total value of the European food processing industry. MetricValueTotal production value of the primary food processing industry in 2023€78 billionShare of total food processing industry value7%Primary food processing is supported by a diverse network of companies operating across Europe, ranging from large scale processors to specialised manufacturers. Industry activityEstimated number of companies in the EU in 2024Vegetable oils70Flour mill productsApproximately 2,800Sugar34Vegetable proteins125Starches30Cocoa29The industry directly employs more than 137,500 people across the European Union and supports many more jobs throughout the wider agri food value chain. IndustryDirect jobsVegetable oils20,000Vegetable proteins32,500Flour mill products45,000Starches16,000Sugar24,000CocoaN/A**Primary food processors total****137,500 direct jobs**Beyond direct employment, primary food processors play a vital role in supporting farm incomes and agricultural employment across Europe, with more than 1.1 million farmers linked to these value chains. IndustryIndirect farm level employment in 2023Oils and fats503,548 personsWheat flour mill products329,246 personsSugar101,548 personsVegetable proteins123,851 personsStarches and starch products110,646 persons**Total****1,168,840 farmers** **Categories:** News --- ## Pages ### [Home](https://pfp-eu.org/) **Published:** February 13, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** # Welcome to Primary Food Processors PFP is the association for the European primary food processing industry to the European institutions and international organisations. [ Contact Us ](https://pfp-eu.org/contact-us/) ##### Primary commodities [![wheat illustrtaion](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Group-1.svg)](/primary-commodities/#Flour)### [Flour](/primary-commodities/#Flour) [![sugar illustration](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Sugar.svg)](/primary-commodities/#Sugar)### [Sugar](/primary-commodities/#Sugar) [![Starch icon](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Starch.svg)](/primary-commodities/#Starch)### [Starches](/primary-commodities/#Starch) [![Vegetable Oil and Protein Meal Icon](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/VegetableOil-2.svg)](/primary-commodities/#Vegetable_Oil)### [Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal](/primary-commodities/#Vegetable_Oil) [![Vegetable protein icon](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Group-5.svg)](/primary-commodities/#Vegetable_Protein)### [Vegetable Protein](/primary-commodities/#Vegetable_Protein) [![Cocoa icon](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Cocoa.svg)](/primary-commodities/#Cocoa)### [Cocoa](/primary-commodities/#Cocoa) - - - - - - - #### Primary Food Processors (PFP) is the association for the European primary food processing industry to the European institutions and international organisations Primary Food Processors represent a vital link in the food and feed chain, turning agricultural raw materials from farmers into a range of safe and high-quality primary food products for human consumption and feed materials destined for animals. We process over 220 million tonnes of agricultural raw materials every year. EU Primary Food Processors are the largest users of domestic cereals, starch potatoes, sugar beet and oilseeds in the EU. They are also sizeable users of imported commodities, like cocoa, soybeans, tropical oils and, to a certain extent, high-quality wheat. [ Contact Us ](https://pfp-eu.org/contact-us/) #### Our Priorities [ ](/our-priorities/#learnmore_ourpriorities) ## [ Ensuring food security in Europe​ ](/our-priorities/#learnmore_ourpriorities) [ ](/our-priorities/#learnmore_sustainability) ## [ Contributing to Europe’s industrial and green transitions​ ](/our-priorities/#learnmore_sustainability) https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/pfp\_video.mp4 #### We need a primary processing industry in Europe. EU Primary Food Processors transform agricultural raw materials — such as cereals, oilseeds, sugar beet, starch crops, cocoa, and vegetable oils — into essential ingredients for Europe’s food and feed sectors. Through their close cooperation with farmers, PFP members form a vital link between agriculture and the food manufacturing industries. As biorefineries, they contribute to the goals of the bio-based economy. The quality and safety of both agricultural raw materials and end products is paramount to our industries. [ Priorities ](/our-priorities/) #### Latest News [VIEW ALL](/news-publications/) [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Brochure](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/brochure/) 17 June , 2026 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Energy](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/energy/) 5 March , 2026 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) 11 February , 2026 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 25 December , 2025 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) 17 December , 2025 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) 17 December , 2025 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 11 December , 2025 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 30 April , 2025 [Position Papers](https://pfp-eu.org/category/position-papers/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Food regulatory issues](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/food-regulatory-issues/) 28 April , 2025 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) 12 April , 2025 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) 1 April , 2025 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 25 March , 2025 [Position Papers](https://pfp-eu.org/category/position-papers/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) 21 February , 2025 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Sustainability of the supply chain](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/sustainability-of-the-supply-chain/) 28 January , 2025 [Position Papers](https://pfp-eu.org/category/position-papers/) - [Food regulatory issues](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/food-regulatory-issues/) 25 January , 2025 [Position Papers](https://pfp-eu.org/category/position-papers/) - [Cap and market instruments](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/cap-and-market-instruments/), [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/), [Food regulatory issues](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/food-regulatory-issues/), [Sustainability of the supply chain](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/sustainability-of-the-supply-chain/) 14 January , 2025 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 12 April , 2024 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 14 February , 2024 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/) 9 February , 2024 [Position Papers](https://pfp-eu.org/category/position-papers/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Food regulatory issues](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/food-regulatory-issues/) 14 September , 2023 [Position Papers](https://pfp-eu.org/category/position-papers/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Sustainability of the supply chain](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/sustainability-of-the-supply-chain/) 12 July , 2023 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 7 July , 2023 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 28 April , 2023 [Position Papers](https://pfp-eu.org/category/position-papers/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 20 March , 2023 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 20 March , 2023 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 8 November , 2022 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 29 September , 2022 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 20 September , 2022 [Position Papers](https://pfp-eu.org/category/position-papers/) - [Sustainability of the supply chain](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/sustainability-of-the-supply-chain/) 12 September , 2022 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 8 September , 2022 ### EU Primary Food Processors link farmers to markets, transforming agricultural crops into the ingredients necessary to produce the plant-based food consumed by millions of EU citizens every day. [ Contact Us ](https://pfp-eu.org/contact-us/) --- ### [Contact Us](https://pfp-eu.org/contact-us/) **Published:** February 26, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** # Contact Us Do you need to get in touch with us? Please follow the instructions below. [ Contact Us ](#learnmore_contact) [ LEARN MORE ](https://pfp-eu.org/about/) Address [Avenue de Tervuren 168 (box 12) B-1150 Brussels](https://maps.app.goo.gl/kNnt6VQAQ4BtDpUL7) Phone Number [+32 (0)2 774 51 01](tel:+32027745101) Email General inquiries: Transparency register no.: 71338036982-24 - [ Official Bluesky Page ](https://bsky.app/profile/pfp-eu.bsky.social) - [ Official LinkedIn Page ](https://www.linkedin.com/company/primaryfoodprocessors/) - [ Official X Page ](https://x.com/PFPEurope) Full Name(Required) Email(Required) Message(Required) Submit --- ### [Privacy Policy](https://pfp-eu.org/privacy-policy/) **Published:** February 26, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** # Privacy Policy Updated: June 22, 2026 [ Contact Us ](/contact-us/) [ LEARN MORE ](#learnmore_privacypolicy) ### Privacy Policy This privacy policy for Primary Food Processors (PFP) (**“We”**, **“Us”** or **“Our”**) tells you how we may collect, use and share your information when you visit our website . We appreciate your decision to use our website and to trust us with your valuable personal information. In this document, we seek to explain in the clearest terms possible our privacy practices. We strongly encourage you to read this document (and any other related documents) carefully before using the website. If there are any terms or conditions in this document that you do not agree with, please do not use the website, or in case you are already using it, please discontinue the use immediately. By using the website, you are accepting and consenting to the practices described in this Privacy Policy. **What information do we collect about you?** When we collect information, we do so to ensure that you get to experience our service seamlessly. For that, we collect the following information. Some are your personal information and some are your sensitive personal information. The personal information that we collect about you are the following: - Name - Email address **How do we collect such information?** We may use any of the following three ways to get information about you. 1. The information that you give us 2. The information that we automatically collect from you 3. Information that we collect from third parties Before going into the reasons why we collect the information that we do, we want you to understand what the above three terms mean. *a. The information that you give us* When you sign up for an account to use our service/product we will ask you certain questions like your name or email address. These are the information that you give us. This may not be limited to what we have mentioned and can change according to the nature of the service/product that we provide. *b. The information that we automatically collect from you* When you access our service from a device, we may automatically collect information from your device, such as through the use of cookies. You will know more about automatic collection of personal information in the next section. *c. Information that we collect from third parties* These third parties can be data aggregators, online directories, data marketplaces or exchanges, etc from where we may collect information about you. **Cookies and similar technologies** Cookies are small packets of information that are placed on your device, so that we can retrieve the information about you, such as your login information, your choices on our websites and other information. For more information about cookies and similar technologies, please visit our [cookie policy](https://www.pfp-eu.org/privacy-policy/) below. **Do not track requests** We respond to “do not track” requests in the following manner: Our cookie consent form blocks cookies if consent is not granted. **Why do we collect information about you?** We collect information about you for a variety of reasons. It helps us, among other things, to serve you better. The following are the ways in which we use the information that we collect about you. - To contact the user - To examine the usage trends **How long do we retain your information?** We will only keep your personal information for 12 months, unless a longer retention period is required or permitted by law (such as tax, accounting, or other legal requirements). No purpose in this notice requires us to retain your personal information for longer than the period during which users have an account with us. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymise such information, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible. **Do we share your information?** We may share your information with third parties in the following ways: 1. **Sharing with your consent:** When you give consent, we may share your information with third parties for the purposes that are mentioned in the consent notification. 2. **Legal Obligations:** We may disclose information where we are legally required to do so in order to comply with applicable law, governmental requests, a judicial proceeding, court order, or legal process, such as in response to a court order or a subpoena (including in response to public authorities to meet national security or law enforcement requirements). 3. **For business transfers:** We may share your personal information in connection with, or during the course of negotiations regarding merger, sale of business assets, financing or acquisition of all or a part of our business by another entity. **Sale/sharing of information** We do not sell or share the information we collect from our users. **GDPR Disclosures** **Automatic processing of data** We do not use any automated processing of the personal information we collect. **Legal basis for the collection** The General Data Protection Regulation requires us to identify and set out the legal basis, or in other words, the legal justification, for processing your personal information. The following are the legal bases on which we process your personal data. **Consent:** We may process your personal information for the purposes described in this Privacy Policy with your consent. **Your rights** In accordance with Articles 12 to 23 of the General Data Protection Regulation, the data subject, that is you, has the following rights. 1. Right to object to the processing of personal data in certain circumstances. See [here](https://gdpr-info.eu/art-21-gdpr/) for details. 2. Right to request access to the data we have collected about you and to receive a copy of it in an accessible format. 3. Right to restrict the processing of your personal data for a limited period, under certain circumstances. See [here](https://gdpr-info.eu/art-18-gdpr/) for details. 4. Right to rectify or modify personal information that you consider obsolete, incomplete, or inaccurate. 5. Right to opt out of automated processing of your personal data. 6. Right to erasure of your personal information, also known as the right to be forgotten. To exercise any of the rights mentioned above, you may use the contact details provided in this Privacy Policy. **Consequences of non-consent** We require your consent to collect information in order to provide our services to you seamlessly. However, you may refuse consent. Please note that refusing consent may have consequences, including limited access to our services and reduced features on the website. **Privacy of children** We do not knowingly provide our services to children. If you are a parent or legal guardian and believe that your child has provided us with information without your consent, please contact us. Upon verification that we have collected such information without parental consent, we will remove the information from our database. **Security of your personal information** We take reasonable measures to ensure that the information we collect from you is stored securely and protected to the best extent possible. However, no method of internet transmission or digital storage is completely secure, and we cannot guarantee absolute security. While we use commercially reasonable and appropriate security measures to protect your information, we cannot promise that it will be 100% secure. **Links to other websites or apps** On our website, we may provide links to external websites, apps, or services. These are not operated by us and therefore are not governed by our Privacy Policy or practices. We strongly recommend that you review the privacy policies of such websites or services before engaging with them to ensure that you do not provide personal information that you do not wish to share. **Changes to this privacy policy** We may update this Privacy Policy from time to time to reflect changes in the law or our privacy practices. We recommend that you review this privacy policy periodically to ensure it remains in line with your expectations. The privacy policy will be effective from the date it is posted on this page. **Contact us** For any questions or concerns regarding your privacy, or to exercise any of your rights, you may contact us using the following details: **DPO:** Geneviève Jacques, info@pfp-eu.org **Address:** Avenue de Tervuren 168, B-1150 (btw 12), Brussels, Belgium **Email address:** **Link to our contact page:** ![Primary Food Processors PFP Green background with light white shapes narrow](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/curv_bg-scaled.jpg) ### Cookie Policy **What are cookies?** This Cookie Policy explains what cookies are, how we use them, the types of cookies we use (i.e., the information we collect using cookies and how that information is used), and how to manage your cookie settings. Cookies are small text files used to store small pieces of information. They are stored on your device when a website loads in your browser. These cookies help ensure that the website functions properly, enhance security, provide a better user experience, and analyse performance to identify what works and where improvements are needed. **How do we use cookies?** Like most online services, our website uses both first-party and third-party cookies for various purposes. First-party cookies are primarily necessary for the website to function properly and do not collect any personally identifiable data. The third-party cookies used on our website primarily help us understand how the website performs, track how you interact with it, keep our services secure, deliver relevant advertisements, and enhance your overall user experience while improving the speed of your future interactions with our website. **Types of cookies we use** **Manage cookie preferences** Consent Preferences You can modify your cookie settings anytime by clicking the ‘Consent Preferences’ button above. This will allow you to revisit the cookie consent banner and update your preferences or withdraw your consent immediately. Additionally, different browsers offer various methods to block and delete cookies used by websites. You can adjust your browser settings to block or delete cookies. Below are links to support documents on how to manage and delete cookies in major web browsers. Chrome: Safari: Firefox: [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/clear-cookies-and-site-data-firefox?redirectslug=delete-cookies-remove-info-websites-stored&redirectlocale=en-US](https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/clear-cookies-and-site-data-firefox?redirectslug=delete-cookies-remove-info-websites-stored&redirectlocale=en-US) Internet Explorer: If you are using a different web browser, please refer to its official support documentation. ### Primary Food Processors link farmers to markets, transforming agricultural crops into the ingredients necessary to produce the plant-based food consumed by millions of EU citizens every day. [ Contact Us ](/contact-us/) --- ### [About](https://pfp-eu.org/about/) **Published:** February 16, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** # We are EU Primary Food Processors Primary Food Processors’ mission is to represent the European primary food processing industries’ interests, at the level of both European and international institutions. [ Contact Us ](/contact-us/) [ LEARN MORE ](#learnmore_about) #### In order to fulfil its mission, the EU Primary Food Processors’ association has three functions. - To promote the European primary food processing industry’s views to the European institutions, international organisations and other interested bodies; - To improve understanding of its operational requirements, especially in responding to Members of the European Parliament, European Commission’s consultative bodies and services, international organisations’ consultations and through liaison with other parties, in particular with the European farmers and partners in the food supply chain; - To provide information and advice to its members on a wide range of common subjects. [ Read More ](/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/PFP_A5_6page_digital.pdf) ![European primary food processing industry](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/image-12.png) #### Board of Directors Christophe Beaunoir Member of the PFP Board (FEDIOL President) Giovanni Tamburini PFP President (CEFS President) Emiel Van Dijk Member of the PFP Board (ECA Board Member) Christophe Lescroart Member of the PFP Board (Starch Europe President) Sophie Verpoort Member of the PFP Board (EUVEPRO President) Gary Sharkey Member of the PFP Board (Vice-President for European Flour Millers) #### Committee of Associations’ Managers The Secretaries-General or Directors-General of the 6 member associations are responsible for the daily management of PFP. Nelli Hajdu Starch Europe Marie-Christine Ribera CEFS – European Association of Sugar Manufactures Catherine Entzminger European Cocoa Association Laurent Reverdy European Flour Millers Nuria Moreno EUVEPRO – European Vegetable Protein Association Nathalie Lecocq FEDIOL – The EU Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry #### Members [ ![European Cocoa Association Logo](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/image-8.svg) ](http://www.eurococoa.com/) ###### [European Cocoa Association](http://www.eurococoa.com/) Catherine Entzminger – Secretary General ECA aisbl Avenue de Tervueren 168, Box 8 1150 Brussels | Belgium Tel: +32 2 662 00 06 [VISIT](http://www.eurococoa.com/) [ ![European Committee of Sugar Manufacturers Logo](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/image-7.svg) ](http://www.cefs.org/) ###### [European Association of Sugar Manufacturers](http://www.cefs.org/) Marie-Christine Ribera – Director General CEFS 182 avenue de Tervuren 1150 Bruxelles Tel: + 32 2 762 07 60 [VISIT](http://www.cefs.org/) [ ![European Flour Milling Association Logo](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/image-6.svg) ](http://www.flourmillers.eu/) ###### [European Flour Millers](http://www.flourmillers.eu/) Laurent Reverdy – Secretary General European Flour Millers 13A avenue de Tervueren, 1040 Bruxelles Tel: + 32 2 736 53 54 E-mail: secretariat@flourmillers.eu [VISIT](http://www.flourmillers.eu/) [ ![FEDIOL European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry Logo](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/image-2-1024x1018.png) ](http://www.fediol.eu/) ###### [The EU Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry](http://www.fediol.eu/) Nathalie Lecocq – Director General FEDIOL aisbl 168 avenue de Tervuren (bte 12) 1150 Bruxelles Tel: + 32 2 771 53 30 [VISIT](http://www.fediol.eu/) [ ![Starch Europe Logo](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/image-10.svg) ](http://www.starch.eu/) ###### [Starch Europe](http://www.starch.eu/) Nelli Hajdu – Managing Director Starch Europe 43 avenue des Arts 1040 Bruxelles Tel: + 32 2 289 67 60 [VISIT](http://www.starch.eu/) [ ![](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/EuveproLogo.svg) ](http://www.euvepro.eu/) ###### [European Vegetable Protein Association (EUVEPRO)](http://www.euvepro.eu/) Nuria Moreno – Secretary General EUVEPRO c/o KELLEN Avenue de Tervueren 188A 1150 Bruxelles Tel: + 32 2 761 16 50 [VISIT](http://www.euvepro.eu/) --- ### [News & Publications](https://pfp-eu.org/news-publications/) **Published:** February 17, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** # News & Publications Here you can find the latest news and updates from our association. [ Contact Us ](/contact-us/) [ Read More ](/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/PFP_A5_6page_digital.pdf) #### Featured [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Energy](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/energy/) 5 March , 2026 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) 11 February , 2026 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 25 December , 2025 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) 17 December , 2025 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) 17 December , 2025 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 11 December , 2025 [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) 30 April , 2025 [Position Papers](https://pfp-eu.org/category/position-papers/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Food regulatory issues](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/food-regulatory-issues/) 28 April , 2025 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) 12 April , 2025 [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) 1 April , 2025 #### All News & Publications Select… Cap and market instruments Competitiveness Energy Food regulatory issues Sustainability of the supply chain Trade Category Filter Position Papers Press Releases News [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Energy](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/energy/) - 5 March, 2026 ## VIEW [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) - 11 February, 2026 ## VIEW [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - 25 December, 2025 ## VIEW [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) - 17 December, 2025 ## VIEW [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) - 17 December, 2025 ## VIEW [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - 11 December, 2025 ## VIEW [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - 30 April, 2025 ## VIEW [Position Papers](https://pfp-eu.org/category/position-papers/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - [Food regulatory issues](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/food-regulatory-issues/) - 28 April, 2025 ## VIEW ### The Primary Food Processing sector is the multiplier in the chain. The transformation layer in the chain helps scale harvest volumes into high-quality, versatile food ingredients. [ Contact Us ](/contact-us) --- ### [Our Priorities](https://pfp-eu.org/our-priorities/) **Published:** February 17, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** # Our Priorities Primary food processors are the backbone of a resilient continent, transforming raw materials into the essential ingredients that ensure food security in Europe. To lead the way forward, our sector must be recognized as a priority industry, contributing to Europe’s industrial and green transitions through sustainable innovation and decarbonisation. [ Contact Us ](/contact-us/) [ LEARN MORE ](#learnmore_ourpriorities) ![primary food processors pfp wheat illustration](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Group-17.svg) ###### Ensuring food security in Europe ![primary food processors pfp leaves illustration](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Group-18.svg) ###### Contributing to Europe’s industrial and green transitions #### Ensuring food security in Europe Ensuring food security requires a stable, sustainable, and competitive supply of agricultural raw materials in both quality and quantity. Because primary processing plants operate continuously, they must secure a steady inflow of agricultural raw materials throughout the year, as their transformation processes cannot be interrupted. Securing a reliable supply of high-quality agricultural raw materials is imperative for Europe’s food security and the competitiveness and growth of European primary food processors. - [ Leveraging precision breeding technologies like NGTs to enhance crop resilience. ](#) - [ Promoting the development of safer Plant Protection Products for the environment, farmers, and the population. A risk-based approach based on predictability, clarity and reasonable enforcement burden is needed. ](#) By combining technological innovation with regulatory predictability, Europe can build a resilient supply chain that meets current demands and anticipates future challenges. [ Read More ](/tag/food-regulatory-issues/) ![Flour - wheat icon](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Group-17-1.jpg) ![Sustainability icon Contributing to Europe’s industrial and green transitions](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Group-18-2.jpg) #### Contributing to Europe’s industrial and green transitions Primary food processors face a structural decarbonisation challenge due to the energy-intensive nature of their operations and the rural location of many facilities. Limited access to affordable low-carbon electricity, high power prices, grid bottlenecks, and slow permitting make full electrification technically appealing but economically difficult. Therefore, parallel deployment of other technologies is necessary. We advocate for a technology-neutral approach, as no single solution fits all. - [ A predictable carbon pricing framework that provides accessible transition finance is particularly vital for sectors like primary food processing, which rely on proven, mature technologies to achieve immediate and meaningful emissions reductions. ](#) - [ Because the sector is highly trade-exposed, ETS reforms and the phase-out of free allowances must reflect technological readiness. ](#) We play a vital industrial role. Granting our sector comparable status to other major energy-intensive industries would create a more cohesive framework for industrial decarbonization clusters and state aid, ensuring we can fully contribute to Europe’s industrial and green transition. [ Read More ](/tag/competitiveness/) --- ### [Primary commodities](https://pfp-eu.org/primary-commodities/) **Published:** February 18, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** # Primary commodities The primary food processing industry uses around 220 million tonnes of agricultural raw commodities (cereals, sugar beet, rape-seeds, soy beans, sunflower seeds, crude vegetable oil, starch potatoes, cocoa beans, and more) a year, employing over 120,000 people in Europe. Below is a brief introduction to each of the sectors composing the EU Primary Food Processors association. [ Contact Us ](/contact-us/) [ LEARN MORE ](#learnmore_primarycommodities) [ ![Flour icon](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Group-1.jpg) ](http://www.flourmillers.eu/) ###### [Flour](http://www.flourmillers.eu/) The flour milling industry is the largest single food user of domestic wheat, rye and oats in Europe, transforming 47 million tonnes of grain each year to supply food and feed industries in Europe and beyond. Wheat flour is a key input for bread, bakery products, pasta, biscuits, and other everyday foods consumed across Europe. The number of flour mills exceeds 3,000 with a large majority of small and medium-sized enterprises. The sector employs some 45,000 people directly and estimated 350,000 indirect labour at European farm level. Competition is strong, margins are limited, and efficiency and scale matter. Milling remains a territorially anchored activity, with mills present all over Europe and strong links to regional farming. [VISIT](http://www.flourmillers.eu/) [ ![Sugar icon](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Group-37.jpg) ](http://www.cefs.org/) ###### [Sugar](http://www.cefs.org/) The European Union is the world’s leading producer of beet sugar, accounting for approximately 50% of global production. Between 2019 and 2024, the EU produced an average of 16 million tonnes of sugar per year. The industry operates 83 active factories across the EU-27 (plus two in Switzerland), which serve as essential economic hubs in rural areas. The sector accounts for roughly 25,000 direct factory jobs and supports an additional 250,000 jobs throughout the supply chain. Beyond sugar, the process is highly efficient: it produces protein-rich animal feed and renewable ethanol from the same crop, making the most of every beet to provide a steady foundation for the European bio-based economy. [VISIT](http://www.cefs.org/) [ ![Starches icon](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Group-38.jpg) ](http://www.starch.eu/) ###### [Starches](http://www.starch.eu/) The EU starch sector is a key pillar of Europe’s agri-food and industrial economy. It employs around 16,000 people, supports 60,000 farmers, and processes nearly 25 million tonnes of EU-grown crops each year. As a versatile processing platform, it converts wheat, maize and potatoes into food ingredients, feed proteins, fermentation substrates, bio-based materials and industrial inputs used across multiple value chains. With highly efficient, near zero-waste processes, the sector connects agriculture to food, feed and industrial value chains—playing an essential role in advancing Europe’s bioeconomy and circular, low-carbon transition. [VISIT](http://www.starch.eu/) [ ![Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Icon](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Group-41-e1771415757851.jpg) ](http://www.fediol.eu/) ###### [EU Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal](http://www.fediol.eu/) The vegetable oil and proteinmeal industry transforms EU produced agricultural raw materials and imported commodities, including crude vegetable oils, into a range of safe and high-quality products. With about 180 facilities in Europe, the sector accounts for 20,000 direct jobs. Its members process approximately 60 million tonnes of commodities a year, both of EU origin and imported from third country markets. The meals and the crude and refined oils are sold for food, feed, technical and energy uses essentially on the European market. [VISIT](http://www.fediol.eu/) [ ![Vegetable Protein icon](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Group-5.jpg) ](http://www.euvepro.eu/) ###### [Vegetable Protein](http://www.euvepro.eu/) The European vegetable protein sector is a dynamic and innovation‑driven part of the agri‑food value chain, supplying high-quality protein ingredients for food applications. Across the EU, the sector comprises around 125 primary processing companies and supports approximately 32,500 direct jobs. Vegetable proteins are derived from a wide range of crops, including cereals, oilseeds, pulses and roots, and are processed into protein flours, concentrates, isolates, hydrolysates and texturised formats. Wheat, soy and pea proteins currently account for the majority of volumes, with increasing diversification into other plant sources. These proteins are used across a broad range of applications, such as bakery products, meat and fish preparations, dairy alternatives, snacks and specialised nutrition. Thanks to their nutritional value, functional properties and versatility, vegetable proteins support product development, reformulation and evolving dietary choices. [VISIT](http://www.euvepro.eu/) [ ![Cocoa icon](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Group-40.jpg) ](http://www.eurococoa.com/) ###### [Cocoa](http://www.eurococoa.com/) The EU cocoa industry transforms imported cocoa beans into a range of high-quality semi-finished products – cocoa liquor, cocoa butter, and cocoa powder – that are the essential building blocks for Europe’s world-renowned chocolate and confectionery industry, as well as for food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical applications. European Cocoa Association’s Members process commodities sourced primarily from producing countries in West Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia, supplying both European and international markets. The industry is also a significant source of direct employment across Europe and producing countries. [VISIT](http://www.eurococoa.com/) --- ### [Events](https://pfp-eu.org/events/) **Published:** February 18, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** # Events Here you can find upcoming and past events. [Contact Us](/contact-us/) [LEARN MORE](#learnmore_events) #### Upcoming Events No data was found #### All Events ### Primary Food Processors link farmers to markets, transforming agricultural crops into the ingredients necessary to produce the plant-based food consumed by millions of EU citizens every day. [Contact Us](/contact-us) --- ## My Templates ### [Footer](https://pfp-eu.org/?elementor_library=footer) **Published:** February 13, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** ![European Vegetable Protein Association EUVEPRO Logo](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/EuveproLogo_logo.svg) ![European Flour Milling Association Logo](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/image-6.svg) ![European Committee of Sugar Manufacturers Logo](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/image-7.svg) ![European Cocoa Association Logo](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/image-8.svg) ![FEDIOL European Vegetable Oil and Proteinmeal Industry Logo](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/image-2-1024x1018.png) ![Starch Europe Logo](https://pfp-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/image-10.svg) All content provided on this website is for informational purposes only. - [ Avenue de Tervuren 168, B-1150 (btw 12), Brussels, Belgium ](https://maps.app.goo.gl/kNnt6VQAQ4BtDpUL7) - [ +32 (0)2 774 51 01 ](tel:
32027745101) - [ info@pfp-eu.org ](mailto:info@pfp-eu.org) - [ Transparency register no. 71338036982-24 ](https://transparency-register.europa.eu/search-register-or-update/organisation-detail_en?id=71338036982-24) - [ Privacy Policy ](/privacy-policy/) Copyright 2026 © PFP | All Rights Reserved | Made with ???? by [Boostern](https://www.boostern.com/) [ Bluesky Logo Icon ](https://bsky.app/profile/pfp-eu.bsky.social) [ Linkedin-in ](https://www.linkedin.com/company/primaryfoodprocessors/) [ X-twitter ](https://x.com/PFPEurope) [GO TO TOP](#header) --- ### [Default Kit](https://pfp-eu.org/?elementor_library=default-kit) **Published:** February 12, 2026 **Author:** admin --- ### [Home Video - Popup](https://pfp-eu.org/?elementor_library=home-video-popup) **Published:** March 5, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** Content area --- ### [News Archive](https://pfp-eu.org/?elementor_library=news-archive) **Published:** March 6, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** [ Contact Us ](/contact-us/) [ LEARN MORE ](#learnmore_archive) No News was found --- ### [Header](https://pfp-eu.org/?elementor_library=header) **Published:** February 13, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** Generic selectors Exact matches only Search in title Search in content Post Type Selectors [ Contact Us ](https://pfp-eu.org/contact-us/) --- ### [News single](https://pfp-eu.org/?elementor_library=news-single) **Published:** February 20, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** [ Contact Us ](/contact-us/) [ LEARN MORE ](#learnmore_newssingle) View View ## Related [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - 9 March, 2026 ## VIEW [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/category/position-papers/competitiveness/)[News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - 25 February, 2026 ## VIEW [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - 25 February, 2026 ## VIEW [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - 25 February, 2026 ## VIEW [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) - 25 February, 2026 ## VIEW --- ### [Event Single Post](https://pfp-eu.org/?elementor_library=event-single-post) **Published:** February 18, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** [ Contact Us ](/contact-us/) [ LEARN MORE ](#learnmore_eventsingle) - - - - Register Here #### Programme #### Event Attachment ## Upcoming Events --- ### [Header Sidebar - Popup](https://pfp-eu.org/?elementor_library=header-sidebar-popup) **Published:** February 16, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** Content area --- ### [Error 404](https://pfp-eu.org/?elementor_library=error-404) **Published:** February 20, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** # 404 ### The page you are looking for seems to be missing Go back, or return to **[pfp-eu.org](pfp-eu.org)** to choose a new page. --- ### [Search Results](https://pfp-eu.org/?elementor_library=search-results) **Published:** February 25, 2026 **Author:** admin **Content:** [ Contact Us ](#) [ LEARN MORE ](#) No data was found --- ## Hero Carousel ### [55 - 60 million tonnes of oil commodities per year for food, feed, technical and energy](https://pfp-eu.org/hero-carousel/55-million-tonnes-of-oil-commodities-per-year-for-food-feed-technical-and-energy/) **Published:** February 24, 2026 **Author:** admin --- ### [More than 1.3 million tonnes of plant‑based protein ingredients are produced in Europe each year.](https://pfp-eu.org/hero-carousel/more-than-1-3-million-tonnes-of-plant-based-protein-ingredients-are-produced-in-europe-each-year/) **Published:** February 24, 2026 **Author:** admin --- ### [Total EU beet sugar production is around 15 million tonnes per year](https://pfp-eu.org/hero-carousel/total-eu-beet-sugar-production-is-around-15-million-tonnes-per-year/) **Published:** February 24, 2026 **Author:** admin --- ### [Processing around 25 million tonnes of agricultural raw materials (17 million tonnes of cereals and 7 million tonnes of starch potatoes) into 11 million tonnes of starches and about 5 million tonnes of plant-based proteins and fibres for food and feed.](https://pfp-eu.org/hero-carousel/processing-around-25-million-tonnes-of-agricultural-raw-materials-17-million-tonnes-of-cereals-and-7-million-tonnes-of-starch-potatoes-into-11-million-tonnes-of-starches-and-about-5-million-tonnes/) **Published:** February 24, 2026 **Author:** admin --- ### [Two-thirds of Europe’s cocoa beans grinding, half of Europe’s industrial chocolate production and 40% of the world production of cocoa liquor, butter and powder](https://pfp-eu.org/hero-carousel/two-thirds-of-europes-cocoa-beans-grinding-half-of-europes-industrial-chocolate-production-and-40-of-the-world-production-of-cocoa-liquor-butter-and-powder/) **Published:** February 24, 2026 **Author:** admin --- ### [220 million tonnes of agricultural raw material processed yearly, generating over 120.000 jobs with a turnover of 70 billion euros + providing indirect employment to more than 1 million farmers.](https://pfp-eu.org/hero-carousel/220-million-tonnes-of-agricultural-raw-material-processed-yearly-generating-over-120-000-jobs-with-a-turnover-of-70-billion-euros-providing-indirect-employment-to-more-than-1-million-farmers/) **Published:** February 24, 2026 **Author:** admin --- ### [Processing 47 million t of wheat, rye & oats each year to produce high-quality flours](https://pfp-eu.org/hero-carousel/processing-47-million-t-of-wheat-rye-oats-each-year-to-produce-high-quality-flours/) **Published:** February 24, 2026 **Author:** admin --- ## Event ### [PFP Forum 2025](https://pfp-eu.org/event/pfp-forum-2025/) **Published:** April 29, 2025 **Author:** admin **Content:** ### **PFP Forum 2025: From Field to Market: Unlocking the Competitive Edge of Primary Food Processing** **April 29th, 2025 | 15:00 to 17:00 hrs (CET)** **Residence Palace, Brussels** ### **Invitation** Primary Food Processors are a vital link between agriculture and consumers. We transform agricultural raw materials into high-quality food ingredients, animal feed, and bio-based products that support the EU bioeconomy. As key players in the EU’s food, feed, and industrial value chains, we help safeguard food security, drive innovation, and sustain rural economies. However, primary food processing sectors face increasing global competition, price volatility, and decarbonisation challenges. By keeping our competitiveness high on the EU agenda, we can ensure a robust, sustainable, and secure food supply chain for Europe. Join us for a high-level discussion with policy makers and key stakeholders, moderated by **Natasha Foote**, on how to maintain the competitive edge of EU primary food processing. **The event will be followed by a cocktail reception.** ### **Programme** **Tuesday 29 April 2025, 15:00 – 17:00** Residence Palace, Rue de la Loi 155, 1040 Bruxelles Moderation by Natasha Foote **15:00****Welcome** Christophe Lescroart, Member of the PFP Board**15:20****Wageningen Research – Results on the PFP competitiveness study** Michiel Van Galen, Project Manager & Researcher Virág Szijjártó, Researcher Sustainable & Innovative Value Chains Wageningen Economic Research**15:50****Introductory Briefs from the European Commission****The competitiveness of primary food processing and the vision for Europe’s agri-food sector** Fabien Santini, Head of Unit Governance of the agri-food markets, DG AGRI **How the EU is supporting industrial decarbonisation** Tom Howes, Adviser Green Transition and Market Regulation, DG ENER **16:10****Panel discussion** Patrick Pagani, Deputy Secretary General, COPA-COGECA Christophe Lescroart, Member of the PFP Board Tom Howes, DG ENER Fabien Santini, DG AGRI**Q&A with audience****17:00****Conclusions by the moderator****17:05****Cocktail reception** --- ### [PFP Forum 2020 on Climate Change](https://pfp-eu.org/event/pfp-forum-2020-on-climate-change/) **Published:** October 14, 2020 **Author:** admin **Content:** ### **PFP Forum 2020 on Climate Change** ### **Invitation** **Climate change: impacts on primary food sectors and ways towards carbon neutrality** **Wednesday 14 October 2020 18:30 to 19:45** ### **Event Overview** The 2020 edition of the PFP Forum was held online, hosted by **MEP Norbert Lins (EPP)**, Chair of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development at the European Parliament. The European Parliament has declared a climate emergency, calling on the European Commission to step up emissions reductions by 2030 to reach climate neutrality by 2050. Awareness and understanding of climate change impacts on PFP supply chains, particularly in arable farming and animal production, must be strengthened to ensure proper adaptation. For this online edition, PFP invited both stakeholders and experts to present their views on the environmental challenges ahead for this vital link in the food chain. Speakers included Tomas Wyns (Free University of Brussels), co-author of a report on decarbonising industry for the EU High-Level Group on energy-intensive industries, Rauli-Jan Albert (Confederation of Finnish Cooperatives), and Christophe Rupp-Dahlem (PFP President). The presentations were followed by a discussion moderated by Gerardo Fortuna, Agrifood editor for Euractiv. Participants were invited to join the discussion through an online webinar format. ### **Programme** **18:30****Introduction** MEP Norbert Lins, Chair of Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development at the EP**18:35****The perspectives from the primary food industry** Christophe Rupp-Dahlem, PFP President**18:55****PFP industries reaching carbon neutrality: chances and hurdles** Tomas Wyns, Free University of Brussels**19:10****Impacts on the supply chains of agro commodities** Rauli-Jan Albert, Confederation of Finnish Cooperatives**19:25****Questions and answers****19:45****End** --- ### [PFP Forum 2021](https://pfp-eu.org/event/pfp-forum-2021/) **Published:** November 22, 2021 **Author:** admin **Content:** ### **PFP Forum 2021** ### **Invitation** **Food security and resilience: the challenge of the Green Deal’s Farm to Fork strategy for raw material supply** **Monday 22 November 2021 14:30 to 16:00** ### **Event Overview** Although the availability of food is not a major concern in Europe today, ensuring a sustainable, safe, affordable supply of nutritious food still requires continuous efforts from all actors in the supply chain. Food systems currently account for nearly one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, consume large amounts of natural resources, contribute to biodiversity loss, and do not always allow fair economic returns for primary producers. Following the launch of the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity strategies, several reports have been published analysing their impact, including studies from the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC). These raise key questions: What are the common trends? Where does the research converge? What further research is required? PFP has invited experts to present their views on these challenges facing this vital link in the food chain. ### **Programme** **14:30****Welcome** Mr. Gary Sharkey, PFP President**14:35****Modelling environmental and climate ambition in the agricultural sector** *What the analysis and data tell us about the feasibility of transitioning towards sustainable food systems* Mr. Jesus Barriero-Hurle, Senior Economist, Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission**14:45****Implications of the Green Deal’s Farm-to-Fork Strategy on businesses and supply chain players** *A trader’s perspective* Mr. Oliver Balkhausen, Director of Economic Research at ADM**14:55****The forthcoming challenges & perspectives for the farming community** Mr. Max Schulman, Farmer and Chair of the Agri-Food Chain Roundtable**15:05****The view of the European Commission** Mr. Tassos Haniotis, Deputy Director-General at DG Agriculture, European Commission**15:15****The view of the Primary Food Processor** Mr. Gary Sharkey, PFP President**15:25****Discussion** *Moderated by Ms. Florence Ranson, REDComms***16:00****Ends** --- ### [PFP EU Sustainable Energy Day Event 2023](https://pfp-eu.org/event/pfp-eu-sustainable-energy-day-event-2023/) **Published:** June 12, 2023 **Author:** admin **Content:** Primary food processing is the energy-intensive link in the food supply chain. But it is often overlooked in the discussion around decarbonisation; falling between agriculture and industry it is in fact both. This session should help to boost the profile of primary food processing in the debate on decarbonising EU industry in general, leading to an enriched discussion and, potentially, the discovery of new solutions. Primary food processing is fundamental to the EU’s food security, which in the current geopolitical context can no longer be taken for granted. Decarbonising our sectors will be essential if we are to avoid increasing the EU’s dependence on food imported from overseas. This session discussed how to decarbonise energy-intensive primary food processing in the EU and why a mix of tools are needed to get there, including electrification, biomass, energy efficiency, and energy sobriety. With presentations from: - Albrecht Schaper, Head of Environment, Permits & Licenses at Nordzucker - Stephan Ghekiere, Environmental Regulatory Compliance Lead at Cargill - Jozefien Vanbecelaere, Head of EU Affairs at European Heat PumpsAssociation - Oliver Sartor, Senior Advisor Industry at Agora EnergiewendeFollowed by panel discussion and Q&A. If you weren’t able to make it, or simply wish to listen to the interesting debate once more, you will find the full recording of the event below:  --- ## Categories ### [News](https://pfp-eu.org/category/news/) **Description:** Your blog category --- ### [Position Papers](https://pfp-eu.org/category/position-papers/) --- ### [Press Releases](https://pfp-eu.org/category/press-releases/) --- ## Tags ### [Competitiveness](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/competitiveness/) --- ### [Trade](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/trade/) --- ### [Food regulatory issues](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/food-regulatory-issues/) --- ### [Sustainability of the supply chain](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/sustainability-of-the-supply-chain/) --- ### [Cap and market instruments](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/cap-and-market-instruments/) --- ### [Energy](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/energy/) --- ### [Brochure](https://pfp-eu.org/tag/brochure/) ---